Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Yale University Press, New Haven, 2012
ISBN 10: 0300149875 ISBN 13: 9780300149876
Anbieter: Dan Pope Books, West Hartford, CT, USA
Erstausgabe
Hardcover. Zustand: New. Zustand des Schutzumschlags: New. 1st Edition. Cloth. First printing. Very fine in a very fine dust jacket. A pristine copy, new and unread. Smoke-free. Shipped in well-padded box.
Zustand: New. Intends to revive the people's right to petition the government for a redress of grievances as a key part of First Amendment jurisprudence. Num Pages: 352 pages. BIC Classification: LNDF. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 234 x 156 x 33. Weight in Grams: 617. . 2012. Hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
HRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.
EUR 76,44
Anzahl: 5 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.
EUR 80,99
Anzahl: 3 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. pp. xvi + 317.
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 89,40
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
EUR 89,81
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbGebunden. Zustand: New. Intends to revive the people s right to petition the government for a redress of grievances as a key part of First Amendment jurisprudence.Über den AutorRonald J. Krotoszynski, Jr., is John S. Stone Chair and Professor of Law at.
Zustand: Sehr gut. Zustand: Sehr gut | Seiten: 334 | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher | Keine Beschreibung verfügbar.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Yale University Press Mai 2012, 2012
ISBN 10: 0300149875 ISBN 13: 9780300149876
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Since the 2004 presidential campaign, when the Bush presidential advance team prevented anyone who seemed unsympathetic to their candidate from attending his ostensibly public appearances, it has become commonplace for law enforcement officers and political event sponsors to classify ordinary expressions of dissent as security threats and to try to keep officeholders as far removed from possible protest as they can. Thus without formally limiting free speech the government places arbitrary restrictions on how, when, and where such speech may occur.