soler lena (28 Ergebnisse)

Zustand: acceptable. Ausreichend/Acceptable: Exemplar mit vollständigem Text und sämtlichen Abbildungen oder Karten. Schmutztitel oder Vorsatz können fehlen. Einband bzw. Schutzumschlag weisen unter Umständen starke Gebrauchsspuren auf. / Describes a book or dust jacket that has the complete text pages (including those with maps or plates) but may lack endpapers, half-title, etc. (which must be noted). Binding, dust jacket (if any), etc may also be worn.

Zustand: Neuf.

Zustand: New. This is a Brand-new US Edition. This Item may be shipped from US or any other country as we have multiple locations worldwide.

Zustand: New.

HRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 472 pages. 8.00x5.00x1.00 inches. In Stock.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 336 pages. French language. 9.37x6.46x0.87 inches. In Stock.

Softcover. Zustand: Bon. Edition 2001. Ammareal reverse jusqu'à 15% du prix net de cet article à des organisations caritatives. ENGLISH DESCRIPTION Book Condition: Used, Good. Edition 2001. Ammareal gives back up to 15% of this item's net price to charity organizations.

Zustand: New. 2015. 1st Edition. Hardcover. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Kartoniert / Broschiert. Zustand: New.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 472 pages. 8.00x5.00x1.00 inches. In Stock.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 354 pages. 9.02x5.98x0.87 inches. In Stock.

Zustand: New. KlappentextrnrnCould all or part of our taken-as-established scientific conclusions, theories, experimental data, ontological commitments, and so forth have been significantly different? Science as It Could Have Been focuses on a crucia.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Science after the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science | Léna Soler (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | Einband - flex.(Paperback) | Englisch | 2017 | Routledge | EAN 9781138062733 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Libri GmbH, Europaallee 1, 36244 Bad Hersfeld, gpsr[at]libri[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.

Zustand: New. pp. 408 52:B&W 6.14 x 9.21in or 234 x 156mm (Royal 8vo) Case Laminate on White w/Gloss Lam.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware -Ce livre traite de questions épistémologiques controversées à propos des sciences. Sous la forme originale et conviviale d'une série de dialogues, les échanges abordent d'une part des questions posées à propos des diverses sciences contemporaines (nature du progrès scientifique, prétention à la vérité des théories scientifiques, limites de la connaissance humaine) et d'autre part des questions plus spécifiques liées à l'interprétation de la physique contemporaine.Books on Demand GmbH, Überseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 204 pp. Französisch.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Could all or part of our taken-as-established scientific conclusions, theories, experimental data, ontological commitments, and so forth have been significantly different Science as It Could Have Been focuses on a crucial issue that contemporary science studies have often neglected: the issue of contingency within science. It considers a number of case studies, past and present, from a wide range of scientific disciplines--physics, biology, geology, mathematics, and psychology--to explore whether components of human science are inevitable, or if we could have developed an alternative successful science based on essentially different notions, conceptions, and results. Bringing together a group of distinguished contributors in philosophy, sociology, and history of science, this edited volume offers a comprehensive analysis of the contingency/inevitability problem and a lively and up-to-date portrait of current debates in science studies.

Zustand: Sehr gut. Zustand: Sehr gut | Seiten: 395 | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher | Keine Beschreibung verfügbar.

Gebunden. Zustand: New.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware -Mature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the ¿successfulness¿, ¿reliability¿ or ¿trustworthiness¿ of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of ¿robustness¿, often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of this term. This lack of clarity is the cause of frequent misunderstandings, since all these notions, and that of robustness in particular, are connected to fundamental issues, which concern nothing less than the very nature of science and its specificity with respect to other human practices, the nature of rationality and of scientific progress; and science¿s claim to be a truth-conducive activity. This book offers for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the problem of robustness, and in general, that of the reliability of science, based on several detailed case studies and on philosophical essays inspired by the so-called practical turn in philosophy of science.Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 384 pp. Englisch.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Mature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the 'successfulness', 'reliability' or 'trustworthiness' of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of 'robustness', often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of this term. This lack of clarity is the cause of frequent misunderstandings, since all these notions, and that of robustness in particular, are connected to fundamental issues, which concern nothing less than the very nature of science and its specificity with respect to other human practices, the nature of rationality and of scientific progress; and science's claim to be a truth-conducive activity. This book offers for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the problem of robustness, and in general, that of the reliability of science, based on several detailed case studies and on philosophical essays inspired by the so-called practical turn in philosophy of science.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Mature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the 'successfulness', 'reliability' or 'trustworthiness' of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of 'robustness', often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of this term. This lack of clarity is the cause of frequent misunderstandings, since all these notions, and that of robustness in particular, are connected to fundamental issues, which concern nothing less than the very nature of science and its specificity with respect to other human practices, the nature of rationality and of scientific progress; and science's claim to be a truth-conducive activity. This book offers for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the problem of robustness, and in general, that of the reliability of science, based on several detailed case studies and on philosophical essays inspired by the so-called practical turn in philosophy of science.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 2012 edition. 384 pages. 9.25x6.10x0.87 inches. In Stock.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 2012 edition. 382 pages. 9.45x6.30x1.02 inches. In Stock.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - LÉNA SOLER This volume is a collection of essays devoted to the analysis of scientific change and stability. It represents the most recent thinking on the topic of incommensurability and scientific theory change. It explores the balance and tension that exists between commensurability and continuity (or stabilities) on the one hand, and incommen- rability and discontinuity (or ruptures) on the other. And it discusses some central epistemological consequences regarding the nature of scientific progress, rationality and realism. With respect to these topics, it investigates a number of new avenues and revisits some familiar issues, with a focus on the history and philosophy of physics, in a way that is informed by developments in cognitive sciences as well as the claims of 'New experimentalists'. The essays in this book are fully revised versions of papers which were ori- nally presented at the international colloquium, 'Repenser l'évaluation comparative des théories scientifiques: stabilités, ruptures, incommensurabilités ' organized by Léna Soler and Paul Hoyningen-Huene at the University of Nancy, France, in June 2004. Each paper is followed by a critical comment, which either represents an opposing viewpoint or suggests some developments. The conference was a striking example of the sort of genuine dialogue that can take place between philosophers of science, historians of science and scientists who come from different traditions and endorse opposing commitments. I hope that this is evident in the book too and that it will constitute one of its attractions.

Gebunden. Zustand: New. Represents the most recent thinking on the topic of incommensurability and scientific theory changeEach individual chapter appears with a critical commentary that typically represents an opposing viewpointReflects and promotes interaction b.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 288 pages. 9.00x6.25x1.00 inches. In Stock.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - LÉNA SOLER This volume is a collection of essays devoted to the analysis of scientific change and stability. It represents the most recent thinking on the topic of incommensurability and scientific theory change. It explores the balance and tension that exists between commensurability and continuity (or stabilities) on the one hand, and incommen- rability and discontinuity (or ruptures) on the other. And it discusses some central epistemological consequences regarding the nature of scientific progress, rationality and realism. With respect to these topics, it investigates a number of new avenues and revisits some familiar issues, with a focus on the history and philosophy of physics, in a way that is informed by developments in cognitive sciences as well as the claims of 'New experimentalists'. The essays in this book are fully revised versions of papers which were ori- nally presented at the international colloquium, 'Repenser l'évaluation comparative des théories scientifiques: stabilités, ruptures, incommensurabilités ' organized by Léna Soler and Paul Hoyningen-Huene at the University of Nancy, France, in June 2004. Each paper is followed by a critical comment, which either represents an opposing viewpoint or suggests some developments. The conference was a striking example of the sort of genuine dialogue that can take place between philosophers of science, historians of science and scientists who come from different traditions and endorse opposing commitments. I hope that this is evident in the book too and that it will constitute one of its attractions.