r tuedio (13 Ergebnisse)

hardcover. Zustand: Fair. No Jacket. Acceptable condition because it is an Ex-library book. Posted within 1 working day. Royal Mail Tracked 24 to UK. Tracked Airmail worldwide. Robust recyclable packaging. Picture is the actual item.

Zustand: Fine. 430 pp., hardcover, fine in a very good dust jacket. - If you are reading this, this item is actually (physically) in our stock and ready for shipment once ordered. We are not bookjackers. Buyer is responsible for any additional duties, taxes, or fees required by recipient's country.

Zustand: Good. Zustand des Schutzumschlags: Good. D Reidel Pub Co, 1988. Dustjacket edges very lightly bumped; spine ends/cover corners very lightly bumped; binding tight; dustjacket, cover, edges, and interior intact and very clean; a nice copy. hardcover. Good/Good. 8vo - over 7¾" - 9¾" tall.

Zustand: Good. Volume 194. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has hardback covers. In good all round condition. Dust jacket in fair condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,800grams, ISBN:902772640X.

Zustand: New. In.

Zustand: New. In.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 1988 edition. 436 pages. 9.25x6.10x0.99 inches. In Stock.

Gebunden. Zustand: New. Phenomenology and analytic philosophy have skirmished often, but seldom in ways conducive to dialectical progress. Generally, the skirmishes seem more political than philosophical, as when one side ridicules the methods of the other or criticizes the viab.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Phenomenology and analytic philosophy have skirmished often, but seldom in ways conducive to dialectical progress. Generally, the skirmishes seem more 'political' than philosophical, as when one side ridicules the methods of the other or criticizes the viability of the other's issues and assump tions. Analytic interest in third person objectivity is often spurned by Continental philosophers as being unduly abstract. Continental interest in first person subjectivity is often criticized by analysts as being muddled and imprecise. Logical analysis confronts the power of metaphor and judges it 'too ambiguous' for rigorous philosophical activity. The language of metaphor confronts the power of logical analysis and deems it 'too restric tive' for describing the nature and structures of authentic human exper ience. But are the two approaches really incompatible Perhaps because each side of the 'divide' has been working at problems largely uninteresting to the 'opposition' it has been easy to ignore or underestimate the importance of this issue. But now each side is being led into a common field of problems associated with the nature of mind, and there is a new urgency to the need for examining carefully the question of conceptual compatibility and the potential for dialogue. Analytic thinkers are typically in the business of concept clarification and objective certi fication. Continental philosophers employ introspection in the interest of a project of description and classification that aims to be true to the full subtlety and complexity of the human condition.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Phenomenology and analytic philosophy have skirmished often, but seldom in ways conducive to dialectical progress. Generally, the skirmishes seem more 'political' than philosophical, as when one side ridicules the methods of the other or criticizes the viability of the other's issues and assump tions. Analytic interest in third person objectivity is often spurned by Continental philosophers as being unduly abstract. Continental interest in first person subjectivity is often criticized by analysts as being muddled and imprecise. Logical analysis confronts the power of metaphor and judges it 'too ambiguous' for rigorous philosophical activity. The language of metaphor confronts the power of logical analysis and deems it 'too restric tive' for describing the nature and structures of authentic human exper ience. But are the two approaches really incompatible Perhaps because each side of the 'divide' has been working at problems largely uninteresting to the 'opposition' it has been easy to ignore or underestimate the importance of this issue. But now each side is being led into a common field of problems associated with the nature of mind, and there is a new urgency to the need for examining carefully the question of conceptual compatibility and the potential for dialogue. Analytic thinkers are typically in the business of concept clarification and objective certi fication. Continental philosophers employ introspection in the interest of a project of description and classification that aims to be true to the full subtlety and complexity of the human condition.

Dordrecht, Reidel, 1988. (X) 419 pp. Cloth + dustjacket. Bibliogaphy. (SL, 194) *dustjacket slightly damaged, otherwise good condition* Contributors: Y. Lurie, F. Williams, R. McIntyre, R. van Gulick, J.W. Bender, S. Fuller, H. Hall, R.C. Richardson, J. Munz a.o.

[OTTO (H.R.) and TUEDIO (J.A.) eds.].Perspectives on Mind.Dordrecht, 1988, in-8°, cart. pl. toile édit. 700 gr.

Reidel ("Synthese Library", 194), Dordrecht etc., 1988, in-8, rel. éd., jaq. Bel ex.