morello frank (7 Ergebnisse)

Zustand: Good. 1966. No Edition Remarks. 107 pages. Paperback with paper covers. Library copy, with expected inserts and inscriptions. Foreword by Paul K. T. Sih. Pages remain bright and clear with minimal tanning and foxing. Binding remains firm. Paper cover has slight edge wear with minor marks and slight creases.

Unknown_Binding. Zustand: Good. Zustand des Schutzumschlags: No Dust Jacket. Library stamps/marks/labels/pocket, sunned, toned, edgewear, light wear. Solid trade paperback.; Contents: Foreword; Preface; I. Introduction; II. Early History of Formosa; III. Conferences and Declarations: Their Effect on the Status of Formosa; IV. Claims of the Formosan Nationalists; V. International Opinions on the Status of Formosa; VI. Claims of the Chinese Communists; VII. Claims of the Republic of China; VIII. Present Status of Formosa; Bibliography; Index. ; Ex-Library; 0 pages.

Zustand: New. In.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 1966 edition. 120 pages. 9.25x6.10x0.28 inches. In Stock.

Zustand: Good. 325 pp., HARDCOVER (same isbn), ex library else text clean and binding tight. - If you are reading this, this item is actually (physically) in our stock and ready for shipment once ordered. We are not bookjackers. Buyer is responsible for any additional duties, taxes, or fees required by recipient's country. Photos available upon request.

Zustand: good. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff,1966. Paperback. x,107 pp. Library stamps. Cover sl. worn. Condition : good copy. Keywords : RECHT RECHT, international law, Völkerrecht international law, Völkerrecht.

Zustand: Gut. Zustand: Gut | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher | Can two-Chinas co-exist in the present world order? In a sense they co-exist now-Free China in Taiwan (Formosa) and Communist China on the mainland. Barring a military showdown, this situation could remain for years to come. However, if we seek to put Free China and Communist China on some permanent basis and give them interna­ tional juridical status as abiding and separate entities, then we are faced with serious difficulties. Free China and Communist China co­ exist at present simply because neither can effectively alter the situa­ tion. Each is backed by a power bloc that recognizes the legal existence of only one of these political regimes. The United States does not re­ cognize Peiping, even though it has conducted meetings on the ambas­ sadorial level with the Regime for several years. In a corresponding way, the Soviet bloc of nations refuses to recognize Nationalist China. The situation is very similar to that of two-Germanys, two-Koreas and two-Vietnams. To seek a solution to this political impasse, it is suggested that a "Sino-Formosan State" or some kind of "self-determination" by the Formosans be instituted. This was first expressed by Chester Bowles in his article "The China Problem Reconsidered" (Foreign Affairs, April 1960), and supported by John Carter Vincent in his letter to the editor of the New York Times (December 7,1961). The Conlon Report of 1959 held the same posi. tion. Also, Arnold J.