danelski (12 Ergebnisse)

Hardcover. Zustand: Good. No Jacket. Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Hardcover. Zustand: Good. No Jacket. Former library book; Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Zustand: Good. Good condition. Acceptable dust jacket. Hardcover edition. (law, supreme court, US history, politics) A copy that has been read but remains intact. May contain markings such as bookplates, stamps, limited notes and highlighting, or a few light stains.

Softcover. Zustand: Very Good. First Edition. First edition. 242pp. Pictorial wrappers. One leaf bound folded in half (binder's error), slight foxing on page edges, rubbing on wraps, very good.

Zustand: Fair. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has hardback covers. Clean from markings. In fair condition, suitable as a study copy. No dust jacket. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,900grams, ISBN:

Zustand: Good. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has hardback covers. In good all round condition. Re-bound by library. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,450grams, ISBN:

Zustand: New. In.

Schubert, Glendon A., Editor. Danelski, David Joseph, Editor. Comparative Judicial Behavior: Cross-Cultural Studies of Political Decision-Making in the East and West. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969. xxii, 412 pp. Illustrations. Publisher's red cloth with gilt stamped spine. Moderate shelfwear. Ex-library with ink shelf location label to foot of spine. Property stamp to verso title page. Bookplate of San Francisco College for Women to front pastedown. Card pocket to rear pastedown. Date to slip to rear free endpaper, otherwise internally clean. A good copy. $45. * The book is a collection of original empirical studies conducted by political scientists and lawyers. It utilizes quantitative techniques, such as scalogram analysis and content analysis, to examine how judicial decisions are made across different cultures and legal systems. Schubert and Danelski's work challenged the "legal subculture" view-the idea that judges are "judicial computers" who only follow legal rules-and instead highlighted the "democratic subculture" where human characteristics play a vital role in outcomes. It remains a widely cited reference for scholars researching the development of judicial ideology and the evolution of the field.

Zustand: New. Brings together leading scholars of the courts who employ social science theory and research to explain the role of the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court. They consider his appointment, office, powers, and influence both within the Court and in the American system of government more generally. Editor(s): Danelski, David J.; Ward, Artemus. Num Pages: 464 pages, 20 tables, 52 figures. BIC Classification: 1K; JPH; LBB. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 229 x 152 x 41. Weight in Grams: 862. . 2016. Hardback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 242 pages. 9.50x6.50x0.75 inches. In Stock.

hardcover. Zustand: Sehr gut. 118 Seiten; 9783936554267.2 Gewicht in Gramm: 500.

From the Library of the Notable American lawyer and Legal Scholar David Joseph Danelski Woolfolk, William. Opinion of the Court. Garden City: Doubleday and Company, 1966. vi, 496 pp. Hardcover. Original cloth very good in worn price clipped dust jacket. Author's presentation inscription "For Daniel Danelski/ Who shares my/ interest in the court/ and the legal tradition/ which this nov[e]l attempts / in a small way to further/ Sincerely/ Bill Woolfolk" to front free endpaper. Internally clean. $125. * A novel centered on the behind-the-scenes drama and conflict within the United States Supreme Court. As a work of fiction, it does not detail a real-life case but explores the political machinations and personal lives of the justices. It details the story of a conservative president who tries to mold the Supreme Court to his liking, creating dramatic conflict among the justices. The plot unfolds over a six-week period, involving a series of contentious court decisions. The novel delves into the secretive deliberations of the court, showing how personal issues, jealousies, and ambitions can influence the outcomes of major rulings. This is extremely likely to be the notable American lawyer and legal scholar David Joseph Danelski (born 1930).