Produktart
Zustand
Einband
Weitere Eigenschaften
Land des Verkäufers
Verkäuferbewertung
Verlag: Harvard Business Review Press, 2001
ISBN 10: 1578516153ISBN 13: 9781578516155
Anbieter: Better World Books, Mishawaka, IN, USA
Buch
Zustand: Good. (rev)01 Edition. Used book that is in clean, average condition without any missing pages.
Verlag: Fundacion Coleccion Thyssen-Bornemisza, 1994
ISBN 10: 8488474148ISBN 13: 9788488474148
Anbieter: Klondyke, Almere, Niederlande
Buch
Zustand: Good.
Verlag: 1995. Ed. Edita Fundación Colección Thyssen Bornemisza., 1994
ISBN 10: 8488474148ISBN 13: 9788488474148
Buch
Imp. Cayfosa. Madrid. . 1 Vol. . 284 pp. pp. Cuarto Apaisado. Rústica. Bellas Artes / Catálogos (Catálogo), Europa (Holanda) . Gran profusión de ilustraciones a color. En buen estado .
Verlag: [Madrid] (Fundación Colleción Thyssen Bornemisza), 1994
Anbieter: Ars Libri, Ltd. (ABAA), Charlestown, MA, USA
283, (3)pp. Prof. illus. (numerous color plates). Oblong 4to. Wraps. (covers neatly detached). Published in conjunction with an exhibition at the Museo Thyssen Bornemisza, Madrid, 1994.
Verlag: Bruce Museum, Greenwich, Ct, 2013
ISBN 10: 0985940905ISBN 13: 9780985940904
Anbieter: Books From California, Simi Valley, CA, USA
Buch
Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good.
Verlag: No place; 12 September, 1812
Anbieter: Richard M. Ford Ltd, London, Vereinigtes Königreich
Manuskript / Papierantiquität
2pp, 4to. Bifolium. In good condition, lightly aged, with thin strip of paper adhering to the reverse of the second leaf, which is addressed, with postmarks, 'To | Doctor Roget M.D. | Bernard Street | London -'. See the entries on Sutton, Roget and Marcet in the Oxford DNB. The letter concerns a misunderstanding between Sutton and Marcet. (Two of Sutton's letters to Marcet with a copy of a reply by Marcet are offered together separately elsewhere.) The present letter is 2pp, 4to. Bifolium. In good condition, lightly aged, with thin strip of paper adhering to the reverse of the second leaf, which is addressed, with postmarks, 'To | Doctor Roget M.D. | Bernard Street | London -'. The letter begins: 'Doctor Sutton's compliments to Doctor Roget and feels somewhat surprized with the honor of a letter from him on the subject of a paper deliver'd to the Medical & Chirurgical Society - Dr Sutton certainly deliver'd the paper to Dr Marcet, with an injunction not to send it to the society until he heard from him, and understood undoubtedly that Dr M wou'd not deliver the paper 'til a further communication.' Sutton claims that 'with this certainty' he has 'as he thought allow'd the paper to remain with Dr Marcet', and he now asks Roget 'to procure him the paper again'. He has 'not yet decided respecting its destination, and whether with others he shall not make it a Society publication, with the addition of that matter which he [?] wou'd be added on a further occasion'. He concludes in the hope that Roget will either 'send the paper inclosed to Murray the Booksellers Fleet St directed to Dr Sutton - Greenwich to be left 'til called for', or allow Sutton to call on him 'in Lincolns Inn on monday or tuesday next'. (Sutton's two letters to Marcet, and the copy of a reply by Marcet, indicater that Sutton had been too forward in his approaches to Marcet, who took offence at having his veracity impugned.) From the distinguished autograph collection of the psychiatrist Richard Alfred Hunter (1923-1981), whose collection of 7000 works relating to psychiatry is now in Cambridge University Library. Hunter and his mother Ida Macalpine had a particular interest in the illness of King George III, and their book 'George III and the Mad Business' (1969) suggested the diagnosis of porphyria popularised by Alan Bennett in his play 'The Madness of George III.
Verlag: ONE:Greenwich; 11 September TWO: 17 September 1812. THREE: 26 September 1812. FOUR: Ruessell Square London; 25 September 1812, 1812
Anbieter: Richard M. Ford Ltd, London, Vereinigtes Königreich
Manuskript / Papierantiquität Signiert
See the entries for Sutton and Marcet in the Oxford DNB. A strained exchange as a result of a misunderstanding over the presentation by Marcet to the Medical and Chirurgical Society of a paper by Sutton. (The following year Sutton would publish his 'Tracts on Delirium Tremens, on Peritonitis, and on Some other Internal Inflammatory Affections, and on the Gout'.) The shift between persons in Sutton's three letters is indicative of a cooling of tone, and in the final item Marcet comes close to accusing Sutton of lying. The four items in good condition, lightly aged and worn, with thin strips of paper from mount adhering to each. ONE: Sutton to Marcet, in third person. Greenwich; 11 September 1812. 1p, 4to. Bifolium. Addressed, with postmark, to 'Doctor Marcet | Russel [sic] Square | Bloomsbury | London'. He will 'either call or send for the manuscript he left with Dr. M. and will thank Dr. M to inclose it directed to Doctor Sutton, that it may be delivered in case Dr Marcet may not be at home'. A postscript suggests that alternatively Marcet may wish to leave the manuscript with 'Mr. Murrays Booksellers Fleet St'. TWO: Sutton to Marcet, signed 'Thos Sutton'. 17 September 1812. 2pp, 4to. Since seeing Marcet, and 'having had some leisure', he has 'been employd in bringing forward three other papers, about the same length as the one I placed in your hands'. He is now considering whether to print them together, 'or take the liberty of presenting them to your society and if thought worthy to be publish'd in the Transactions'. Marcet's 'remarks on the manuscript' have given Sutton 'the greatest satisfaction, and I shall take with consideration those which intimate the propriety of some alteration in regard of form - Whatever may be the destination of the paper I am much pleased it has on the whole met with your approbation and am glad it has been read before the Society'. After a reference to 'Dr. Roget', he ends by expressing his desire to 'avail myself of the opportunity of submitting the paper for their approbation with a view to its publication'. THREE: Sutton to Marcet, in the third person. 'Saturday Eveng. Septr. 26Th 1812'. 3pp, 4to. He is 'sorry any misunderstanding shou'd have happen'd on the subject of his manuscript. Doctor M will probably recollect that Doctor S said he intended to have left the paper with Doctor Saunders for his opinion of it As Doctor Saunders was out of twon Dr S recollecting Dr. M lived in Russel Sqre. thought, at the moment, he wou'd take the liberty, tho' little known to Dr. M -, to ask him to undertake the same office'. Sutton was surprised when he learnt that the paper 'had been presented to the Society, after a lapse of upwards of a fortnight, without any communication with him. Dr Marcets letter from the country certainly acknowledges this omission Dr. Sutton must however say that he had neither the right to give Dr M the trouble he did nor to ask any favor whatever from him, and therefore begs this may be consider'd as roundly an apology for the whole.' The letter concludes in similar conciliatory style. FOUR: Copy of letter from Marcet to Sutton. 'Russel Square | Sept. 25. 1812', but endorsed: 'Copy of a letter to Dr Sutton 26 Sept 1812'. 4pp, 12mo. Bifolium. Expressing regret that 'the disposal of the paper in question, should have occasioned to Dr Sutton so much surprize & uneasiness'. 'Dr. M. however is at a loss to comprehend how he could have mistaken Dr. Sutton's instruction, for he recollects distinctly Dr. S. saying, when he called upon Dr. M., that he wished the paper which he then put into his hands, to be laid before the Medical & Chirurgical Society, and that he had been induced, to sipose of it, in that way in consequenc eof a Suggestion of Mr Ashley Cooper.' Marcet continues in the same vein, concluding somewhat archly: 'With regard to the wish expressed by Dr. S., in his last note, respecting the next meeting of the Council, Dr. M. begs to suggest whether Dr. S. had not better procure the information in question from the official channel, for fear Dr. M. might forget to comply with his request.'.