Inhaltsangabe
This book is a profound examination of slavery in the United States and the deep-rooted history of racism that has shaped the nation. The author traces the evolution of anti-slavery thought from the Founding Fathers to the Civil War, arguing that the institution was fundamentally incompatible with the principles of liberty and equality upon which the country was founded. By delving into the speeches, writings, and actions of key historical figures, the author reveals the complex and often contradictory views on slavery held by Americans throughout history. This book is not only a valuable contribution to the study of slavery in the United States, but also a timely reminder of the ongoing struggle for racial justice in America.
Reseña del editor
Excerpt from Speech of Hon. Reverdy Johnson of Maryland, in Support of the Resolutign to Amend the Constitution So as to Abolish Slavery: Delivered in the Senate of the United States, April 5, 1864
I believe I speak advisedly when I say that, whatever may be their lan guage, the court designed and affirmed no such general proposition. They held what, indeed, cannot be denied, because your legislation recognizes its existence, and because, independent of that recognition, the fact is apparent that a state of war exists. That the insurrection, however at the first it might have been arrested by the mere civil power, had culminated to a point which places it beyond that power, or any other, but the power of war. In saying this, however, the court referred only to the particular cases which were be fore them, and cases of like character, and to the particular questions pre sented by such cases. They relied upon belligerent rights growing out of the actual war, merely with the view to show that goods captured upon the high seas, coming from the territorial limits of the rebellious States, were to be con sidered under the prize law as prize of war; and that the question, whether legal prize or not was to be determined by the principles of the prize law as a part Of the law of nations. But in so ruling, in answer to the objection that, although in one sense a war, it was a rebellion in which each citizen in the re hellions States was guilty of treason against the United States, they said that that was true, but that such parties were not the less to be esteemed enemies because they were traitors.
The court never intimated, as I read their Opinion, that the existence of a belligerent relation between the two forces terminated the civil obligations which the citizens of the rebellious States are under to the Government of the United States; but, on the contrary, announced, as before stated, that their being traitors did not, in the view of the prize law, show that they were not also enemies. The court, I understand, as deciding that each of the citizens or inhabitants of the rebellious States still owes as before unqualified allegiance to the Government Of the United States, and to be under an obligation to ful fil it; and consequently. That when the authority of the United States shall be restored, such of them may be proceeded against as traitors who may have voluntarily aided the rebellion.
About the Publisher
Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com
This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
