Inhaltsangabe
Excerpt from Plea for Religious Liberty and the Rights of Conscience: An Argument Delivered in the Supreme Court of the United States, April 28, 1886, in Three Cases of Lorenzo Snow, Plaintiff in Error V. The United States, on Writs of Error to the Supreme Court of Utah Territory
I am firmly convinced, after a very thorough study of these cases, that both of these inquiries arise on these ree ords. I am to submit to you a constitutional question which involves the religious liberties of these people called Mor mons; and it arises in this way: This man was con victed three several times on evidence which was precisely this and no more, that on a certain day he casually introduced an acquaintance of his to two women, who were present in the marshal's office when he was under arrest, as his wives, and that is all there is of his language which is in evidence in these cases. The whole of his other conduct, if you grasp all its incidents in one bundle, resulted from moral and religious duties, as he estimated and believed his religious duties to be, and this I shall demonstrate to you, I think, is the precise question here. Without a doubt, it presents a constitutional ques tion, and a very grave one.
The first proposition to which I have to ask your atten tion is stated on the 22d page of my brief.
About the Publisher
Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com
This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Reseña del editor
Excerpt from Plea for Religious Liberty and the Rights of Conscience: An Argument Delivered in the Supreme Court of the United States, April 28, 1886, in Three Cases of Lorenzo Snow, Plaintiff in Error V. The United States, on Writs of Error to the Supreme Court of Utah Territory
I am firmly convinced, after a very thorough study of these cases, that both of these inquiries arise on these ree ords. I am to submit to you a constitutional question which involves the religious liberties of these people called Mor mons; and it arises in this way: This man was con victed three several times on evidence which was precisely this and no more, that on a certain day he casually introduced an acquaintance of his to two women, who were present in the marshal's office when he was under arrest, as his wives, and that is all there is of his language which is in evidence in these cases. The whole of his other conduct, if you grasp all its incidents in one bundle, resulted from moral and religious duties, as he estimated and believed his religious duties to be, and this I shall demonstrate to you, I think, is the precise question here. Without a doubt, it presents a constitutional ques tion, and a very grave one.
The first proposition to which I have to ask your atten tion is stated on the 22d page of my brief.
About the Publisher
Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com
This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
