LESSONS IN FREE SPEECH: DEAR SIR: CAN WE TALK? (CASE STATED)

“As I got older, I realised… there are no real winners and there are no real losers in psychological warfare. But there were victims and there were students. It wasn’t David versus Goliath, it was a pendulum eternally swaying from the dark to the light. And the more intensely that the light shone, the darker the shadow it cast. It was never really a battle for me to win, it was an eternal dance.” - Ren
Are you having trouble understanding what the hell is going on in Westminster?
Welcome to the club… we all are and we can all learn from history. Join the living life on a wing and a prayer journey of peaceful non-compliance. ‘Dear Sir’ is a modern-day, fascist tale of criminalising creativity and friendship; a tale of the true British Bulldog spirit battling against the full weight of former UK PM Tony Blair's limitlessly-funded gag order on Freedom of Expression, Article 10. HRA 1998, and ban on Freedom of Assembly, Article 11. HRA 1998 within 1 kilomteter of Westminster - all secretly embedded within Serious Organised Crime legislation: SOCPA 2005 sec. 132 - 138.
Haw’s Law - "A sledge-hammer to crack a nut." - Jack Straw, HANSARD
Who are the real criminals? Who was acting outside of International War law? Who was acting within Human Rights law? What real crimes were committed? At what cost and who profited? Who thieved the Banksys? Is spreading a heart-felt message of ‘Stop killing children - Make peace not war - Let Iraqi infants live’ criminal behaviour? Is hanging out Tony Blair's dirty laundry publicly, in a peaceful/artistic fashion, seriously organised crime or a genuine act of terrorism to be arrested, bailed and gagged over?
Are ‘hurty’ words presently a criminal offence or a possible source for a civil ‘Respect’ order while the state bends the law like Beckham in order to conceal a criminal contempt of court charge, possibly warranting a two-year prison sentence and an unlimited fine, where there will be no summons to a hearing for the defendant to attend and no defence representations allowed - no real crime committed - omitting due process - before a permanent order is made against an individual, in Great Britain 2025, under the Crime and Policing rushed through Bill soon-to-be Act of Parliament?
What?
Simon says stand on your left foot. Simon says touch your nose. What?
No conviction - no criminal or civil trial = a permanent(???) order for matters already legislated for within the Public Order Act 1986 - a course of conduct that could cause or is likely to cause harassment, alarm, and distress. Make it make sense because the math is not mathing. This appears to be pre-emptive ‘no protest’ law; a subversion of due process; yet another potential parliamentary gag order on Free Speech and blame the police silly bollocks set up boldly flashing *** police-jacket neon-yellow***.
The police come from the people and are for the people. They are not the enemy. Who writes the law and who bangs the gavel is what I am seriously questioning - who holds the purse strings? Blaming the police for what the state dictates is irrational. Playing into a divide and conquer mentality is foolish.
Can we please openly discuss and learn from the long history and true cost of cronyism, censorship, lawfare, and genocide? Is spreading a heart-felt Christian message of ‘Peace, Love & Justice For All’ criminal behaviour? Is Free Speech truly a criminal offence in Great Britain, in 2025? Let’s find out together.
Dear Sir:
Hypothesis: What happens when you say Bollocks? To Westminster’? (peacefully and publicly?)
In befriending, being inspired by Brian Haw and artistically speaking of Blair's Westminster - when bollocks are your only weapon, having a vagina does not mean that you have to be one.

"Is this Westminstergate?" - Brian W. Haw