Professor Dhanjoo Ghista about the Book The author has done admirable work to develop the concept of Microvita and its synthesis, from the medieval question of "whether there are 'universalia ante res' impinging on our destiny and fortune", to a model of the atomic nucleus, onto how Devayonis and Pretayonis can be produced pairwise or apart by the action of the neutral and the positive or negative creation operator respectively. Thereafter, we learn how imperialism, together with its different forms, such as capitalism and nationalism, all have one psychological base. This comes about through diminishing the interest for the sublime and enhancing the interest for material goods. Thereafter, we journey from Microvita network formation (clustering, representation, synchronisation and coherency), to Microvita in the context of the Neo-Leibnizian World Model and quantum monadology, whereby consciousness should not be interpreted by our daily experiences, but as an introspectively realized state. Finally, we recognize how Microvita give rise to what is known (in Sanskrit) as advaetadvaeta'dvaetava'da, meaning non-dualistic dualistic non-dualism: Non-dualism from dusk to dawn, dualism only in the daytime of existence.

From Imaginary Oxymora to Real Polarities and Return

A New Science of Reality By Hans-Joachim Rudolph

AuthorHouse

Copyright © 2012 Hans-Joachim Rudolph (MD), Microvita Research e.V.
All right reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-4685-0844-4

Contents

Prologue.............................................................page v01. On the Priority of Imaginary Space...............................page 0102. Let There Be Light...............................................page 0803. Gluon Pair Production............................................page 1204. Putting Things Together..........................................page 1705. Microvita and the Nucleon Model..................................page 1806. The two Faces of Microvita.......................................page 2807. An Analogy with Chess............................................page 3608. Production of Electrons and Positrons............................page 4309. Production of Devayonis and Pretayonis...........................page 4610. Interconnectedness of Microvita..................................page 5011. Microvita in the Life of a Sadhaka...............................page 5512. Microvita in Social Life.........................................page 63MV Seminar 2006......................................................page 76MV Seminar 2008......................................................page 77MV Seminar 2009......................................................page 8013. Microvita and the Neo-Leibnizian World Model.....................page 8214. Microvita and the Grid...........................................page 8615. Microvita and Non-Duality........................................page 8916. Microvita and Quantum Entanglement...............................page 9417. Microvita and the Water Rotational Field.........................page 9718. Microvita and the Syntropic Principle............................page 9919. Conclusion.......................................................page 102Glossary.............................................................page 104References...........................................................page 107Previous Publications................................................page 111Acknowledgement......................................................page 114

Chapter One

On the Priority of Imaginary Space

In medieval times, the nominalists prevailed in a debate that engaged thinkers from Boethius (ca. 480-525) to Ockham (ca. 1288-1348) and beyond. They asserted that only particulars exist and denied that universals are real, i.e. that they exist as entities or beings. In contrast, the idealists maintained that universals are real and exist independently of that on which they might refer (universalia ante res). A third position was presented by the realists, who took the stance that universals are real to the effect that the particulars instantiate the universals (universalia in rebus).

Although the nominalists prevailed in this debate, they were not able to do so in the field of mathematics, where it's generally assumed, down to the present day, that the existence of mathematical entities is basically independent of human minds. Thus humans don't invent, but rather discover mathematics.

Beyond that, renowned contemporary thinkers hold the opinion that not only mathematics, but also human musical, artistic, and aesthetic creativity and appreciation come from contact with the Platonic world of reality (1).

On top of this, the ultimate question has always been whether there are `universalia ante res' impinging on our destiny and fortune - and if so, where such universals could reside?

The following derivation is designed to give an answer to these questions:

Let M_R be a Minkowski space, which is a 4-dimensional flat Lorentzian manifold,

and let M_C be the complexified M_R of dimensionality 8,

with 4 real -t_Re and x_Re, y_Re, z_Re and 4 imaginary dimensions -t_lm and x_lm, y_lm, z_lm.

Then, the standard basis for M_R will be a set of 4 mutually orthogonal vectors (-e₀, e₁, e₂, e₃), such that

(-e₀)² = (e₁)² = (e₂)² = (e₃)² = +1,

and for M_C there will be an additional set of 4 mutually orthogonal vectors (-i₀, i₁, i₂, i₃), such that

(-i₀)² = (i₁)² = (i₂)² = (i₃)² = -1.

Accordingly, each point PC in Mc can be written as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

with t_r, t_i, x_r, x_i, y_r, y_i, z_r, Z_i [member of] R, e² = +1 and i² = -1.

Furthermore, the matrix product of two complex points in M_c will be p_c x p'_c = P_C [member of] M_C =>

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

with (2)

T_r = t'_r t_r + y'_r x_r - t'_i t_i - y'_i x_i,

X_r = - x'_r t_r + z'_r x_r + X'_i t_i - Z'_i x_i,

Y_r = - t'_r y_r + y'_r z_r + V_i y_i - y'_i z_i,

Z_r = x'_r y_r + Z'_r Z_r - X'_i y_i - Z'_i z_i,

T_i = t'_i t_r + y'_i X_r + t'_r t_i + y'_r X_i,

X_i = - x'_i t_r + Z'_i X_r - x'_r t_i + Z'_r X_i,

Y_i = - y'_i y_r + y'_i Z_r - t'_r y_i + y'_r Z_i,

Z_i = x' _iy_r + z'_i z_r + x'_r y_i + z'_r z_i.

Now, let

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

with

T_r = - t'_i t_i - y'_i x_i,

X_r = + X'_i t_i - z'_i X_i,

Y_r = + t'_i y_i - y'_i Z_i,

Z_r = - x'_i y_i - z'_i z_i.

Consequently, let M_l be a subgroup of M_C (M_I [subset] M_C), defined by this premise:

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

The matrix product P_C of imaginary points p_i, p'_i, M_I

is not an element of M_I (p_i, x p'_i, = P_C [member of is not equal to] M_I [subset] M_C),

but an element of M_R (p_i, x p'_i, = P_C [member of] M_R [subset] M_C).

Now, let 3T⁽¹⁾ be the operator, which allows a mapping from the imaginary to the real Minkowski space (M_I -> M_R).

For example:

3T₁ [member of] M_I with

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

=>...