THE LANGUAGE OF LAW: Latin from Roman Jurisprudence to the Modern Courtroom (Roman Law Series, Band 27) - Softcover

Inhaltsangabe

Most Latin legal maxims aren't Roman. This book tells you which ones actually are — and proves it.

Nullum crimen sine lege sounds like it comes straight from the Twelve Tables. It doesn't — a German criminal-law reformer coined it in 1801. Audi alteram partem has been quoted in courtrooms for centuries as ancient wisdom. Its earliest known source is a playwright, not a jurist. Even lex superior derogat inferiori, the bedrock principle of modern constitutional review, owes more to a twentieth-century Austrian legal theorist than to anything Justinian ever compiled.

The Language of Law is a history of legal Latin that refuses to take the Latin at face value. Rather than another list of phrases and translations, it traces where each expression actually came from — genuine classical doctrine, medieval canon law, early modern natural-law theory, or flat-out modern invention dressed in a dead language for gravitas — and shows what's really at stake when a lawyer, judge, or student gets the history wrong.

The book moves in five parts: how Latin became Rome's working legal language and how that language was transmitted across two thousand years; the core vocabulary of persons, property, obligations, and crime as the Roman jurists actually used it; the interpretive toolkit — a fortiori, a contrario, lex specialis — that still shapes legal argument today; worked case studies tracing specific Roman solutions into modern civil-law and common-law doctrine; and a sustained examination of the maxims most likely to mislead, including a full classification of which are genuinely classical, which are medieval, and which are modern coinages in a toga.

It closes with a 150-entry field guide — persons and things, obligations and delict, procedure and crime, interpretive maxims, everyday legal Latin — each entry giving literal meaning, juridical meaning, Roman background (or the honest absence of one), historical development, modern application, a common misconception, and pronunciation.
This is a book for people who want to get it right: law students, practicing lawyers, legal historians, comparative-law scholars, and anyone who has ever wondered whether the Latin phrase they just used actually means what everyone assumes it means.

Substance before style. Evidence before assertion. Precision before ornament.

Cornelis van Houte, LL.D.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.