Verwandte Artikel zu Deixis - Communication could never exist without taking...

Deixis - Communication could never exist without taking deixis into account - Softcover

 
9783656142201: Deixis - Communication could never exist without taking deixis into account

Inhaltsangabe

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, University of Hamburg, language: English, abstract: In language, various ideas can be expressed in alternating ways which, in the end, can all have the same meaning. However, the speaker's choices are influenced and restricted by linguistic factors. The following example of a fictive story shows, how various different words can all have the same meaning "Yesterday, I went to the park and I saw a boy who killed a pigeon by throwing big chunks of bread at its head. This made me so mad that I had to walk up to the boy and yell at him. Telling him that he shouldn't have done what he did, he told me that he didn't do it intentionally." In this little story, "this", "what he did", and "it" all refer to the action of the boy killing the duck with a piece of bread. When the speaker of the story chose the pronoun "it", he must have thought that his audience would easily identify "it" as the action of killing the duck. Speakers often tend to use pronouns instead of using the antecedent because it simplifies and shortens speech analysis. However, sometimes speech analysis can become very complicated and pronouns confuse the listener, let alone simplify the discourse. For example: (1) "Peter hit Harry. After this, he didn't like him anymore." In this case, the listener would have to have contextual information to determine whether Peter did not like Harry anymore or vice versa. Just from reading the sentence, the reader would not know what is really going on. As in this example, or in many other utterances and texts, where chains of pronouns strike the audience, discourse analysis becomes highly complicated.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Reseña del editor

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, University of Hamburg, language: English, abstract: In language, various ideas can be expressed in alternating ways which, in the end, can all have the same meaning. However, the speaker's choices are influenced and restricted by linguistic factors. The following example of a fictive story shows, how various different words can all have the same meaning "Yesterday, I went to the park and I saw a boy who killed a pigeon by throwing big chunks of bread at its head. This made me so mad that I had to walk up to the boy and yell at him. Telling him that he shouldn't have done what he did, he told me that he didn't do it intentionally." In this little story, "this", "what he did", and "it" all refer to the action of the boy killing the duck with a piece of bread. When the speaker of the story chose the pronoun "it", he must have thought that his audience would easily identify "it" as the action of killing the duck. Speakers often tend to use pronouns instead of using the antecedent because it simplifies and shortens speech analysis. However, sometimes speech analysis can become very complicated and pronouns confuse the listener, let alone simplify the discourse. For example: (1) "Peter hit Harry. After this, he didn't like him anymore." In this case, the listener would have to have contextual information to determine whether Peter did not like Harry anymore or vice versa. Just from reading the sentence, the reader would not know what is really going on. As in this example, or in many other utterances and texts, where chains of pronouns strike the audience, discourse analysis becomes highly complicated.

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Gratis für den Versand innerhalb von/der Deutschland

Versandziele, Kosten & Dauer

Suchergebnisse für Deixis - Communication could never exist without taking...

Foto des Verkäufers

Benjamin Türksoy
Verlag: GRIN Verlag, 2012
ISBN 10: 3656142203 ISBN 13: 9783656142201
Neu Taschenbuch

Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland

Verkäuferbewertung 5 von 5 Sternen 5 Sterne, Erfahren Sie mehr über Verkäufer-Bewertungen

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, University of Hamburg, language: English, abstract: In language, various ideas can be expressed in alternating ways which, in the end, can all have the same meaning. However, the speaker's choices are influenced and restricted by linguistic factors.The following example of a fictive story shows, how various different words can all have the same meaning 'Yesterday, I went to the park and I saw a boy who killed a pigeon by throwing big chunks of bread at its head. This made me so mad that I had to walk up to the boy and yell at him. Telling him that he shouldn't have done what he did, he told me that he didn't do it intentionally.' In this little story, 'this', 'what he did', and 'it' all refer to the action of the boy killing the duck with a piece of bread.When the speaker of the story chose the pronoun 'it', he must have thought that his audience would easily identify 'it' as the action of killing the duck. Speakers often tend to use pronouns instead of using the antecedent because it simplifies and shortens speech analysis. However, sometimes speech analysis can become very complicated and pronouns confuse the listener, let alone simplify the discourse. For example:(1) 'Peter hit Harry. After this, he didn't like him anymore.'In this case, the listener would have to have contextual information to determine whether Peter did not like Harry anymore or vice versa. Just from reading the sentence, the reader would not know what is really going on. As in this example, or in many other utterances and texts, where chains of pronouns strike the audience, discourse analysis becomes highly complicated. Artikel-Nr. 9783656142201

Verkäufer kontaktieren

Neu kaufen

EUR 16,95
Währung umrechnen
Versand: Gratis
Innerhalb Deutschlands
Versandziele, Kosten & Dauer

Anzahl: 1 verfügbar

In den Warenkorb

Foto des Verkäufers

Benjamin Türksoy
Verlag: GRIN Verlag, 2012
ISBN 10: 3656142203 ISBN 13: 9783656142201
Neu Taschenbuch

Anbieter: preigu, Osnabrück, Deutschland

Verkäuferbewertung 5 von 5 Sternen 5 Sterne, Erfahren Sie mehr über Verkäufer-Bewertungen

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Deixis - Communication could never exist without taking deixis into account | Benjamin Türksoy | Taschenbuch | 24 S. | Englisch | 2012 | GRIN Verlag | EAN 9783656142201 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: BoD - Books on Demand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt, info[at]bod[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu. Artikel-Nr. 106588528

Verkäufer kontaktieren

Neu kaufen

EUR 16,95
Währung umrechnen
Versand: Gratis
Innerhalb Deutschlands
Versandziele, Kosten & Dauer

Anzahl: 5 verfügbar

In den Warenkorb

Foto des Verkäufers

Benjamin Türksoy
ISBN 10: 3656142203 ISBN 13: 9783656142201
Neu Taschenbuch

Anbieter: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Deutschland

Verkäuferbewertung 5 von 5 Sternen 5 Sterne, Erfahren Sie mehr über Verkäufer-Bewertungen

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, University of Hamburg, language: English, abstract: In language, various ideas can be expressed in alternating ways which, in the end, can all have the same meaning. However, the speaker¿s choices are influenced and restricted by linguistic factors.The following example of a fictive story shows, how various different words can all have the same meaning ¿Yesterday, I went to the park and I saw a boy who killed a pigeon by throwing big chunks of bread at its head. This made me so mad that I had to walk up to the boy and yell at him. Telling him that he shouldn¿t have done what he did, he told me that he didn¿t do it intentionally.¿ In this little story, ¿this¿, ¿what he did¿, and ¿it¿ all refer to the action of the boy killing the duck with a piece of bread.When the speaker of the story chose the pronoun ¿it¿, he must have thought that his audience would easily identify ¿it¿ as the action of killing the duck. Speakers often tend to use pronouns instead of using the antecedent because it simplifies and shortens speech analysis. However, sometimes speech analysis can become very complicated and pronouns confuse the listener, let alone simplify the discourse. For example:(1) ¿Peter hit Harry. After this, he didn¿t like him anymore.¿In this case, the listener would have to have contextual information to determine whether Peter did not like Harry anymore or vice versa. Just from reading the sentence, the reader would not know what is really going on. As in this example, or in many other utterances and texts, where chains of pronouns strike the audience, discourse analysis becomes highly complicated.Books on Demand GmbH, Überseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 24 pp. Englisch. Artikel-Nr. 9783656142201

Verkäufer kontaktieren

Neu kaufen

EUR 16,95
Währung umrechnen
Versand: EUR 1,99
Innerhalb Deutschlands
Versandziele, Kosten & Dauer

Anzahl: 2 verfügbar

In den Warenkorb