The questioning of scientific knowledge is now a global phenomenon. Going far beyond a mere misunderstanding of scientific facts, this mistrust is causing lasting damage to the relationship between researchers, institutions and citizens, in a context characterised by disinformation, the polarisation of public debate and the challenge to traditional forms of expertise.
Even as science remains a vital tool for addressing major contemporary challenges, the relationship between science and society appears to be fraught with conflicting expectations, blending trust and suspicion. How can we restore a sustainable dialogue between the academic world and society? How can we rethink the conditions under which knowledge is produced, disseminated and shared?
Drawing on reflections carried out as part of the ‘Science With and For Society’ (Science Avec et Pour la Société, SAPS) initiative at the University of Paris-Est Créteil, this collective work brings together researchers and practitioners from a variety of disciplines. Through analyses and accounts of practical experience, the authors explore contemporary shifts in the relationship between science and society and advocate for a more open, transparent and participatory science, conceived as a genuine common good serving collective decision-making.
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Philippe Frouté est titulaire d’un doctorat en économie de l’Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. Il est actuellement doyen de l’AEI International School à l’Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne, en France, où il a lancé plusieurs programmes innovants, notamment en International Business, et chercheur au Lipha. Ses recherches portent sur l’analyse économique du droit ainsi que sur les finances publiques. Il a publié de nombreux articles dans des revues académiques telles que l’European Journal of Law and Economics, Applied Financial Economics, Revue Économique, Revue d’Économie Politique et le Journal International de Bioéthique et d’Éthique des Sciences. De plus, il est co-rédacteur en chef de la revue International Transitions.
Olivier Meier est Professeur des Universités HDR de Classe exceptionnelle, Directeur de l’Observatoire ASAP « Action Sociétale et Action Publique » – Chaire « Innovation Publique » en collaboration avec Sciences Po et Polytechnique. Responsable de formations en Master 2, il enseigne la stratégie et le management à l’Université Paris- Est, Paris Dauphine et Sciences Po Paris. Il est Visiting Professor au centre européen d’Harvard Business School et chercheur associé à la Chaire « Prévoyance et Performance » de CentraleSupelec. Ses travaux portent sur la stratégie, le management interculturel et les apports de la sociologie à l’analyse des processus d’innovation. Il est l’auteur d’une soixantaine d’articles et d’une trentaine d’ouvrages. Il a reçu plusieurs prix et distinctions scientifiques, dont celui du meilleur article international décerné par la Family Firm Institute à Chicago (USA).
The questioning of scientific knowledge is now a global phenomenon. Going far beyond a mere misunderstanding of scientific facts, this mistrust is causing lasting damage to the relationship between researchers, institutions and citizens, in a context characterised by disinformation, the polarisation of public debate and the challenge to traditional forms of expertise.
Even as science remains a vital tool for addressing major contemporary challenges, the relationship between science and society appears to be fraught with conflicting expectations, blending trust and suspicion. How can we restore a sustainable dialogue between the academic world and society? How can we rethink the conditions under which knowledge is produced, disseminated and shared?
Drawing on reflections carried out as part of the ‘Science With and For Society’ (Science Avec et Pour la Société, SAPS) initiative at the University of Paris-Est Créteil, this collective work brings together researchers and practitioners from a variety of disciplines. Through analyses and accounts of practical experience, the authors explore contemporary shifts in the relationship between science and society and advocate for a more open, transparent and participatory science, conceived as a genuine common good serving collective decision-making.
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.