Ask: Building Consent Culture - Softcover

Stryker, Kitty

 
9781944934255: Ask: Building Consent Culture

Inhaltsangabe

Kitty Stryker presents a collection of essays exploring the role of consent in confronting power structures in day-to-day life.

Have you ever heard the phrase “It’s easier to ask forgiveness than permission?” Violating consent isn’t limited to sexual relationships, and our discussions around consent shouldn’t be, either.

To resist rape culture, we need a consent culture―and one that is more than just reactionary. Left confined to intimate spaces, consent will atrophy as theory that is never put into practice. The multi-layered power disparities of today’s world require a response sensitive to a wide range of lived experiences.

In Ask, Kitty Stryker assembles a retinue of writers, journalists, and activists to examine how a cultural politic centered on consent can empower us outside the bedroom, whether it’s at the doctor’s office, interacting with law enforcement, or calling out financial abuse within radical communities. More than a collection of essays, Ask is a testimony and guide on the role that negated consent plays in our lives, examining how we can take those first steps to reclaim it from institutionalized power.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Kitty Stryker has been working on defining and creating a consent culture for over a decade. Based in Berkeley, CA, she’s the editor of Ask: Building Consent Culture and author of Ask Yourself: The Consent Culture Workbook, Say More: Consent Conversations for Teens and Love Rebels: How I Learned to Burn It Down Without Burning Out. She is especially interested in bringing conversations about consent into everyday life.

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Ask

Building Consent Culture

By Kitty Stryker

Thorntree Press, LLC

Copyright © 2017 Kitty Stryker
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-944934-25-5

Contents

Foreword – Laurie Penny,
Introduction – Kitty Stryker,
IN THE BEDROOM,
Sex and Love When You Hate Yourself and Don't Have Your Shit Together – JoEllen Notte,
The Legal Framework of Consent Is Worthless – AV Flox,
The Political Is Personal: A Critique of What Popular Culture Teaches About Consent (and How to Fix It) – Porscha Coleman,
IN THE SCHOOL,
Rehearsing Consent Culture: Revolutionary Playtime – Richard M. Wright,
The Power of Men Teaching Men – Shawn D. Taylor,
The Green Eggs and Ham Scam – Cherry Zonkowski,
IN THE JAIL,
Responding to Sexual Harms in Communities: Who Pays and Who Cares? – Alex Dymock,
The Kids Aren't All Right: Consent and Our Miranda Rights – Navarre Overton,
Just Passing By – Roz Kaveney,
IN THE WORKPLACE,
"Ethical Porn" Starts When You Pay for It – Jiz Lee,
There's No Rulebook for This – Tobi Hill-Meyer,
Service with a Smile Is Not Consent – Cameryn Moore,
IN THE HOME,
Consent Culture Begins at Home – Eve Rickert and Franklin Veaux,
Bodily Autonomy for Kids – Akilah S. Richards,
To Keep a Roof Over my Head, I Consented to Delaying my Transition – Laura Kate Dale,
IN THE HOSPITAL,
Giving Birth When Black – Takeallah Rivera,
Fatphobia and Consent: How Social Stigma Mitigates Fat Women's Autonomy – Virgie Tovar,
Wrestling with Consent (and Also Other Wrestlers) – Jetta Rae,
IN THE COMMUNITY,
Games, Role-Playing, and Consent – Kate Fractal,
Trouble, Lies, and White Fragility: Tips for White People – Cinnamon Maxxine,
Sleeping with Fishes: A Skinny Dip into Sex Parties – Zev Ubu Hoffman,
Sex Is a Life Skill: Sex Ed for the Neuroatypical – Sez Thomasin,
Afterword – Carol Queen,


CHAPTER 1

Sex and Love When You Hate Yourself and Don't Have Your Shit Together

JoEllen Notte


In my early twenties, young, searching for love, and with an undiagnosed mental illness, I heard the same words of "wisdom" over and over again: "You can't love someone else until you love yourself." Feeling like I was being asked to do the impossible, I spent a lot of time wondering what one needed to do to convince the world they loved themselves when actually doing it was unimaginable.

In my late twenties, my finally diagnosed but horribly managed depression coincided with a misdiagnosed, mistreated injury. The only thing everyone in my life at the time seemed to agree on was that I was so lucky to have my husband. I was living somewhere I didn't want to live for this man; I was constantly dragging my miserable, hurting self through everything for this man, while committing over and over again to "just try harder" — when I knew I was doing all I could just to keep breathing — for this man. I was dying inside, but wow was I lucky to have someone who would put up with me.

Years later, I'm dating online and very specifically looking for no commitments, no long-term relationships — I'm not asking for anything from anyone. My mentions of books like Opening Up and The Ethical Slut bring all the poly boys to the yard, but frequently, my honesty about my mental health history sends them running, turning to yell over their shoulder the now cliché polyamory mantra "You have to get yourself together first before you can really 'do' non-monogamy!" I look around and notice how many nonmonogamous women I know are concealing their mental health issues and facing struggles on their own in the quest to be the mythic "cool poly girl." I see a lot of women taking a lot of shit with a pasted-on serene smile because they want everyone to know they got themselves together and are now "safe" to be nonmonogamous.

These examples from my own complicated history with both love and mental illness serve to illustrate problematic issues that exist on a larger scale. We, as a society, consistently tell people with mental illnesses that they are not eligible for love.

In our culture, we believe many things about the mentally ill: they are out of control, they need care, they don't have sex, and they are dangerous, but one of the most pervasive and dangerous beliefs is that they are incompetent. Additionally, people struggling with mental illness receive constant reminders that they do not deserve love/acceptance/sexual attention as they are, that they are less than, too much trouble, emotional time bombs who are too broken to give back what they take. As such, they need to try their hardest to act like they are "well" for everyone else's benefit, be damn grateful to be loved despite their brokenness, and not press their luck by needing too much. Working from these beliefs, we end up with situations like I've described above: people who happen to have a mental illness feeling sentenced to loneliness because they have a brain that doesn't let them love themselves first, "broken and lucky" mentally ill people who feel damaged and so lucky that anyone would be with them that they dare not question it, or the buzz kill mentally ill people who might "ruin people's fun" with their needs and thus feel it necessary to hide them. In all of these scenarios we see one common theme: the partner dealing with mental illness is set up to accept a lot of crap they wouldn't be expected to otherwise. All of these situations can lead that partner to surrender their right to true, enthusiastic, genuine, fully embodied consent.

Many people don't love themselves. They can't. They won't ever. Simply telling them they have to do that before they can have the love of anyone else not only is cruel, but can backfire dramatically. Knowing that self-love is the "golden ticket" to the world of love, sex, acceptance, and everything else we're told comes with it can lead to the sort of over-the-top, "I LOVE myself!" play acting that makes one extremely malleable and susceptible to the demands of others dressed up as sex and body positivity. Because after all, why wouldn't they want to do ALL the things if they LOVE themselves, LOVE their body? Right?! Acting out self-love doesn't leave much room for weighing real wants and needs, only for doing what looks like what the character that's been created — the one who LOVES themself so much! — would do.

The "broken and lucky" dynamic, which can be common in relationships where one partner does a lot of caretaking of the other, consistently sends the message that the mentally ill partner is "broken," that they are damaged goods, that they are "less than," and, as such, extremely "lucky" to have a partner at all. Once it's been established that the mere presence of the partner is a gift, every act of caretaking gets added to the relationship balance sheet, and the mentally ill partner is so far in the hole they could never get out. The balance of power in the relationship is completely out of whack, and here is where consent becomes problematic. This dynamic leaves no room for equitable negotiation; it's not a relationship of equals. One partner has all the power and the other — the mentally ill partner — is relying on them, is convinced they need them, and often feels they "owe" their partner so much that they have lost their right to differing opinions, desires, and...

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.