Winning Westeros: How Game of Thrones Explains Modern Military Conflict - Hardcover

 
9781640122215: Winning Westeros: How Game of Thrones Explains Modern Military Conflict

Inhaltsangabe

Set in the fictitious world of Westeros, the hit television series Game of Thrones chronicles the bitter and violent struggle between the realm’s noble dynasties for control of the Seven Kingdoms. But this beloved fantasy drama has just as much to say about the successful strategies and real-life warfare waged in our own time and place. Winning Westeros brings together more than thirty of today’s top military and strategic experts, including generals and admirals, policy advisors, counterinsurgency tacticians, science fiction and fantasy writers, and ground-level military officers, to explain the strategy and art of war by way of the Game of Thrones saga.

Each chapter of Winning Westeros provides a relatable, outside-the-box way to simplify and clarify the complexities of modern military conflict. A chapter on the doomed butcher’s boy whom Arya Stark befriends by World War Z author Max Brooks poignantly reminds us of the cruel fate that civilians face during times of war. Another chapter on Jaqen H’ghar and the faceless men of Bravos explores the pivotal roles that stealth and intelligence play in battle. Whether considering the diplomatic prowess of Tyrion Lannister, the defiant leadership style of Daenerys Targaryen, the Battle of the Bastards and the importance of reserves, Brienne of Tarth and the increased role of women in combat, or dragons as weapons of mass destruction, Winning Westeros gives fans of Game of Thrones and aspiring military minds alike an inspiring and entertaining means of understanding the many facets of modern warfare. It is a book as captivating and enthralling as Game of Thrones itself.

 

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Über die Autorinnen und Autoren

Max Brooks is a writer, public speaker, senior fellow at the Modern War Institute at West Point, and nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. He is the author of World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War, among other works. Brooks, and the other coeditors of this book, edited Strategy Strikes Back: How Star Wars Explains Modern Military Conflict (Potomac Books, 2018). John Amble is the editorial director at the Modern War Institute and a military intelligence officer in the U.S. Army Reserve. ML Cavanaugh is a senior fellow at the Modern War Institute and a U.S. Army strategist with global experience. Jaym Gates is an acquiring editor for Nisaba Press and Falstaff Books, as well as a freelance editor and author.

 

Max Brooks is a writer, public speaker, nonresident fellow at the Modern War Institute at West Point, and nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. He is the author of World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War and The Harlem Hellfighters, among other works. Brooks, and the other coeditors of this book, edited Strategy Strikes Back: How Star Wars Explains Modern Military Conflict (Potomac Books, 2018). John Amble is the editorial director at the Modern War Institute and a military intelligence officer in the U.S. Army Reserve. ML Cavanaugh is a nonresident fellow at the Modern War Institute and a U.S. Army strategist with global experience. His writing has appeared in the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and USA Today, among other publications. Jaym Gates is an acquiring editor for Nisaba Press and Falstaff Books, as well as a freelance editor and author. She is the coeditor of War Stories: New Military Science Fiction

 

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Winning Westeros

How Game of Thrones Explains Modern Military Conflict

By Max Brooks, John Amble, ML Cavanaugh, Jaym Gates

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA PRESS

Copyright © 2019 Max Brooks, John Amble, ML Cavanaugh Jaym Gates
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-64012-221-5

Contents

Foreword James Stavridis, xi,
Part 1. People and War,
1. Mycah's Parents Didn't Get a Vote Max Brooks, 3,
2. A House to Be Feared Jonathan P. Klug, 7,
3. Fear or Love: Insights from Machiavelli for Those Who Seek the Iron Throne Liam Collins, 15,
4. The Source of Tyrion Lannister's Unlikely Survival and Success Joe Byerly, 24,
5. The Mother of Dragons: Defiant Leadership for Uncertain Times Rick Montcalm, 32,
6. Lessons for Command from Khaleesi's Rise Erica Iverson, 39,
7. From Brienne of Tarth to Lyanna Mormont: Shifting Attitudes about Women in Combat Kelsey Cipolla, 47,
8. You Know Something, Jon Snow, about the Qualities of a Strategic Leader P. W. Singer and ML Cavanaugh, 56,
Part 2. Technology and War,
9. The Lessons of Viserion and Technological Advantage Jonathan E. Czarnecki, 67,
10. Game of Pwns: Baelish and Varys as Drivers of Modern Conflict Nina A. Kollars, 79,
11. WMD in Westeros and Beyond Magnus F. Nordenman, 88,
12. The Influence of Sea Power on Westeros Michael Junge, 94,
13. Winning the Waves: Sea Power and the Seven Kingdoms Bryan McGrath, 101,
14. What the Walls of Westeros Teach Us about War and Warfare John Spencer, 108,
Part 3. Combat and War,
15. Siege Warfare in the Seven Kingdoms Lionel Beehner, Benedetta Berti, and Mike Jackson, 119,
16. Dragons, Dothraki, and Achieving Victory in Battle Mick Cook, 129,
17. The Wildlings at the Wall: When Climate Drives Conflict J. Daniel Batt, 137,
18. Shock and Chaos: Psychological Weapons of War in Westeros and Our World Gregory S. Drobny, 147,
19. How to Fight the Lannister Armies Joshua D. Powers and Jonathan Bott, 156,
20. Becoming No One: Human Intelligence in the Seven Kingdoms Andrea N. Goldstein, 165,
21. The Battle of the Bastards and the Importance of the Reserve Jess Ward, 171,
Part 4. Strategy and War,
22. The Myth of the Accidental Strategist Steve Leonard, 181,
23. Why the Westerosi Can't Win Wars Chuck Bies, 189,
24. Strategic Storytelling in Game of Thrones Jaym Gates, 201,
25. Resources, War, and the Night King's Deadly Arithmetic Andrew A. Hill, 208,
26. The Red Wedding and the Power of Norms Theresa Hitchens, 219,
27. Daenerys Targaryen's Coalitions for War Mick Ryan, 227,
28. Arya Stark's Targeted Killing and Strategic Decision-Making Craig Whiteside, 236,
29. Ned Stark, Hero of the Seven Kingdoms, and Why the Good Guys Win (in the End) ML Cavanaugh, 244,
30. White Walkers and the Nature of War Paul Scharre, 253,
Epilogue: Down from the Citadel, Off the Wall ML Cavanaugh, 266,
Contributors, 275,


CHAPTER 1

Mycah's Parents Didn't Get a Vote

Max Brooks


No one likes to imagine they're a nobody. That wouldn't be much of a fantasy. When we watch a show like Game of Thrones, we imagine we're Jon Snow or Daenerys Targaryen or that cool guy with the eyepatch and the flaming sword. We don't imagine we're the dude who gets squashed by the falling bell when Cersei blows up the Sept of Baelor. Nobody fantasizes about being Random Shmuck #17 who gets stabbed by the Sons of the Harpy when they run riot through the fighting pit of Meereen. And I'd be hard pressed to find anyone who shows up to Comicon dressed like Mycah the butcher's son.

And why would anyone want to be? Mycah was a powerless peasant murdered for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. But imagine if we were that powerless peasant. Or his parents. Who would speak up for us? A lawyer? A reporter? An elected representative? Westeros doesn't have any of the institutions that protect the weak from the strong, the same institutions that too many of us take for granted.

Out here in the real world, we complain about the compromises, inefficiency, and slow-grinding gears of democracy. Recently, some have gone even further, calling for the "deconstruction of the administrative state." And while democracy's enemies continue to strengthen and multiply, too many of its defenders can't even be bothered to vote. Because that's what voting feels like to many of us — a bother, a hassle, a pointless, boring chore.

And why shouldn't it? How many of us have experienced the horrors of totalitarian regimes? Russian assassinations, Venezuelan starvation, Chinese execution-backed censorship. Those real-life events get less attention from us than a TV show like Game of Thrones. And that is exactly why Game of Thrones is so important for our time; it is a "stark" reminder of why democracy matters.

If we don't like being governed by a deep state, imagine being ruled by a man who literally is the state. "King takes what he wants," Ned Stark laments to his wife in episode 1. And lamenting is all he can do, because any infantile, psychotic impulse is law. From wars to taxes to murdering babies. Like a "wheel," to quote Daenerys, "crushing those on the ground."

And who's going to save us from that wheel? According to the story, the answer doesn't lie in a better system but a better person. The notion of a good king, someone with the supposed right — and by "right," we mean the freak accident of birth — is the only way that more Mycahs don't end up dead on their parents' doorstep.

At the point of this writing — on the cusp of season 8, the final season — we're supposed to be rooting for Westeros's benevolent power couple, Jon Snow and Daenerys. Both are good people — honest and kind, with a genuine moral compass that, we hope, will point the way to a future of peace and prosperity for all.

But what if it doesn't? What if, as Missandei warns, "it only takes one arrow" to destroy the hopes and dreams of millions? And what if there's a second archer on a grassy knoll that gets Jon as well as Daenerys? Who takes over? And why? Will it be civil war all over again? Isn't that why Westeros fell into chaos in the first place, because King Robert got himself killed in a hunting accident? That's exactly why our codified, legalized, Oswald-Booth-proof line of succession exists today. To ensure that our lives aren't held hostage to chance, that random tragedy doesn't descend into anarchy.

But let's say Daenerys and Jon live to a ripe old age, which in a world of magic and dragon's blood could be centuries long. Who's to say that they'll always remain the benevolent rulers we're getting to know and love. Not every tyrant starts out tyrannical. A lot of them had nothing but the best intentions. If you don't believe that old-timey saying that "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely," just ask the ghosts of Fidel Castro and Muhamar Kaddafi.

And if that happens, if those Dear Leaders eventually decline into paranoid, vindictive mass murderers? What checks and balances does Westeros have in place to stop them? The army? That's what stopped Daenerys's father, the "Mad King." The only difference now is that Daenerys still has her two dragons, and that is a very powerful metaphor for our world. Despots throughout time have feared coups as surely as popular uprisings. That's why they've kept their own dragons called the Praetorian Guard, the Savak, and the SS.

But let's say there's no need for...

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Weitere beliebte Ausgaben desselben Titels

9781640124813: Winning Westeros: How Game of Thrones Explains Modern Military Conflict

Vorgestellte Ausgabe

ISBN 10:  1640124810 ISBN 13:  9781640124813
Verlag: Potomac Books Inc, 2021
Softcover