Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Kim Cameron is professor of management and organization at the University of Michigan Business School and professor of higher education in the School of Education at the University of Michigan. Professor Cameron has served as dean and Albert J. Weatherhead professor of management in the Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University, as associate dean and Ford Motor Co./Richard E. Cook professor in the Marriott School of Management at Brigham Young University, and as a department chair and director of several executive education programs at the University of Michigan. He also has been on the faculties of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Ricks College. He organized and directed the Organizational Studies Division of the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems in Boulder, Colorado.
Marc H. Lavine is a doctoral student and instructor in the Department of Organization Studies at the Wallace E. Carroll School of Management at Boston College. His interests are in the domains of corporate social responsibility, ethics, leadership, and nonprofit and public management. His current research focuses on the role that an organization’s social purpose plays in individual well-being and organizational peak performance. For more than a decade Lavine led and founded nonprofit, educational, and leadership development initiatives in the United States and abroad. He has consulted for multi- national firms, nonprofit organizations, and public schools on issues of social responsibility, organizational learning, and strategic growth. Lavine received his B.A. from Earlham College and his M.B.A. and M.A. in education from the University of Michigan.

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Making the Impossible Possible

Berrett-Koehler Publishers

Chapter One

Once in a great while we find an organization whose performance is so much better than expectations that it is difficult to believe that this level of success is possible-for example, the Revolutionary Army in 1776, the John Wooden-era UCLA basketball teams, or the success of the Grameen Bank movement. Most people hold in their minds standards of what excellence represents, and when we encounter performance that markedly exceeds those standards, we are left to wonder how such an aberration is possible.

This book tells the story of positively deviant performance-the achievement of extraordinary success well beyond the expectations of almost any outside observer. We present the story of an organization that reached a level of performance that was considered impossible, so that adjectives such as "spectacular," "extraordinary," "remarkable," and "astonishing" are apt descriptors. Our account describes how a single organization experienced a devastating loss-the loss of mission and subsequent languishing performance-and then, despite its problematic circumstances, achieved a level of success well beyond expectations.

Simply put, this organization accomplished what most knowledgeable people thought was impossible. The story examines the key enablers that account for this extraordinary level of performance. We explain the leadership principles that can be helpful to individuals in other organizations who are interested in fostering their own spectacular success.

Rocky Flats

This book examines the cleanup and closure of America's most dangerous nuclear weapons production facility. This facility, located near the eastern slope of the Rocky Mountains in Colorado, produced plutonium and enriched uranium triggers for nuclear weapons from 1952 to 1989. Every nuclear weapon in the current U.S. arsenal contains triggers produced at Rocky Flats. Employees worked with the most dangerous materials known to mankind, and an ABC Nightline program in 1994 identified several buildings on the site as the "most dangerous buildings in America" because of the radioactive materials being handled, the threat of a disastrous nuclear accident, and the possibility of radioactive pollution escaping and contaminating the surrounding area.

The Rocky Flats site consisted of approximately 800 buildings, with about 3 million square feet under roof. Located on the 6,000-acre site was an enormous amount of hazardous material-tons of weapons-grade nuclear material including plutonium and enriched uranium, tens of thousands of cubic meters of transuranic acid waste and low-level radioactive liquids, and rooms in some buildings that had radioactive pollution levels reaching beyond infinity on the measuring devices. Contamination existed in walls, floors, ceilings, ductwork, surrounding soil, and, potentially, groundwater. Environmentalists, citizen action groups, state regulatory agencies, federal oversight agencies, and Congress all were understandably distrustful, skeptical, and largely antagonistic toward Rocky Flats. The largest industrial fire in the nation's history had occurred at the site in 1969, and other accidents in the 1950s and 1960s were viewed as evidence that this site was intolerably dangerous. Protests, lawsuits, and an adversarial climate were continuously associated with Rocky Flats. Antagonistic and hostile relationships existed with regulators. A combative stance had been adopted toward the activist community. Noncooperative relationships existed with surrounding states and with other Department of Energy (DOE) sites, resulting in a siege mentality-razor wire fences and guards toting M-16 rifles-that kept outsiders at a distance.

The three unions representing workers-steelworkers, construction workers, and security guards-also had antagonistic relationships with contract company managers, so that formally filed grievances were common among the workforce. Safety was significantly worse than the average at other government facilities and in the construction industry in general. A climate of secrecy, insularity, self-protection, and resistance to change inhibited any hope of a major transformation.

In 1989, because of suspicion that unreported pollution might be occurring, the FBI raided the facility and suddenly shut the place down. Workers immediately lost a mission to perform and were accused of being criminal polluters. In 1992, the Rocky Flats nuclear weapons program was permanently discontinued by order of President George H.W. Bush, so the possibility of continuing to do the jobs for which they were well trained was completely eliminated for Rocky Flats employees.

More radioactive waste existed at Rocky Flats than at any other facility in the country. Consequently, DOE conducted a careful study of the residual pollution at the site in 1995 and concluded that the cleanup and closure of the facility would require more than 70 years and cost at least $36 billion. Similar estimates were developed for thirteen additional DOE sites throughout the United States. An RFP (request for proposal) containing these estimates was circulated to potential contracting companies. The company that won the contract in 1995 was Kaiser-Hill.

What makes the story of Rocky Flats worth telling is the extraordinary level of success achieved-success in terms of speed, quality, efficiency, productivity, innovation, and profitability. As the largest and most complex environmental cleanup project in U.S. history, Rocky Flats was the first nuclear weapons facility to be decommissioned and closed anywhere in the world. But the complexity and uniqueness of the task is not the key message. Rather, the story is worth telling because the entire project was completed 60 years early and at a cost savings of approximately $30 billion in taxpayer funds. In contrast, the other DOE clean-up sites are approximately on-time (or late) and on-budget (or over) in accomplishing the same kinds of tasks.

By October 2005, all 800 buildings had been demolished, all radioactive waste had been removed, and all soil and water had been remediated to a level that exceeded original federal standards for cleanliness by a factor of 13. Simply stated, the impossible was achieved at Rocky Flats. Not only did Kaiser-Hill accomplish what had never been done before, but it was done in a time frame and at a cost that defied any reasonable expectation. To repeat, the other DOE clean-up sites are approximately on-time (or late) and on-budget (or over) in accomplishing the same kinds of tasks. The story of Rocky Flats represents one of the most dramatic examples of organizational success in history. In a New York Times report (2005:A21) on the day of project completion, Senator Wayne Allard of Colorado called the project "the best example of a nuclear cleanup success story ever."

Explaining Extraordinary Success

The book explains how this success occurred. It highlights the key enablers-the levers, techniques, and practices-that explain how this extraordinary performance was realized. Our aim is to help leaders identify which enablers are most effective in producing transformational change and how they can create outstanding success. It is important to point out that these leadership principles are not intended to be restricted to a...