Personal Best: Makers on Their Poems that Matter Most - Softcover

 
9781556596520: Personal Best: Makers on Their Poems that Matter Most

Inhaltsangabe

Home to fifty-eight author-selected poems and accompanying essays, Personal Best: Makers on Their Poems That Matter Most is a far-reaching, essential touchstone for the art of poetry in the United States today.

Personal Best: Makers on Their Poems That Matter Most is home to fifty-eight author-selected poems and accompanying essays that explain how and why each poet chose a poem as their “personal best." The anthology offers a provocative and surprising range of responses in which readers will find poetic context for the life of a poem and revelatory insight into the unique, personal experiences that shape the writing process itself. Including works from a wide variety of voices both new and well-established, Personal Best is a far-reaching, essential touchstone for the art of poetry in the United States today. The anthology gives readers—both long-time fans of poetry and those just discovering its possibilities—an intimate view of the heart and spirit that make poetry one of our most quintessentially human forms of expression.


Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

About the Editors

Erin Belieu is the author of five poetry collections, all from Copper Canyon Press, including her most recent, Come-Hither Honeycomb. Belieu literary activism earned her the AWP's George Garrett Prize for her service to the national writing community, and she co-founded VIDA: Women in Literary Arts and Writers Resist. Belieu teaches in the University of Houston MFA/Ph.D. Creative Writing Program and for Lesley University's low residency MFA program in Cambridge, Massachusetts.


Carl Phillips is a seasoned poet, author, and translator who has published three prose books and sixteen poetry collections, most recently Then the War: New And Selected Poems 2007-2020. His honors include the Pulitzer Prize in Poetry (2023), a Lambda Literary Award, the PEN/USA Award for Poetry, and fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation, Library of Congress, and the Academy of American Poets. He teaches at Washington University in St. Louis with a focus on contemporary poetry, classical philology, and translation.

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

The Clock

The Clock—died on June 24, 2009 and

it was untimely. How many times my

father has failed the clock test. Once I

heard a scientist with Alzheimer's on

the radio, trying to figure out why he

could no longer draw a clock. It had to

do with the superposition of three types.

The hours represented by 1—12, the

minutes where a 1 no longer represents

1 but 5, and a 2 now represents 10, then

the second hand that measures 1 to 60.

I sat at the stoplight and thought of the

clock, its perfect circle and its

superpositions, all the layers of

complication on a plane of thought, yet

the healthy read the clock in one single

instant without a second thought. I

think about my father and his lack of

first thoughts, how every thought is a

second or third or fourth thought,

unable to locate the first most important

thought. I wonder about the man on the

radio and how far his brain has

degenerated since. Marvel at how far

our brains allow language to wander

without looking back but knowing

where the pier is. If you unfold an

origami swan, and flatten the paper,

is the paper sad because it has seen the

shape of the swan or does it aspire

towards flatness, a life without creases?

My father is the paper. He remembers

the swan but can't name it. He no

longer knows the paper swan represents

an animal swan. His brain is the water

the animal swan once swam in, holds

everything, but when thawed, all the

fish disappear. Most of the words we

say have something to do with fish.

And when they're gone, they're gone.

*

from Victoria Chang's Essay on "Clocks"

In retrospect, perhaps my initial resistance to writing about my mother's death was a resistance to the elegy because I felt that everyone had already done it better than I ever could, and elegies didn't feel quite right for my own grieving process or grieving experience. My obits more aptly capture the fragmented nature of my own grief. They also seem more anti-sentimental, anti-celebratory, and perhaps rooted more in philosophy than praise, song, or lament. In this way, my obits feel culturally different to me—they feel like more of a Chinese American experience of grieving and grief.

The poet Matthew Zapruder once said to me that my obit poems “show your thinking" and I think that best encapsulates the process of writing these poems. The thinking mind is rarely linear--it branches, then branches off of the branch, and then off of that branch, then sometimes like a little bee, thinking jumps from branch to branch, flower to flower, tree to tree, and suddenly, the writer is like a drunk bee, buzzing around on a warm spring day, unsure of where she is or where she started, but feeling full, but unlike a bee, poems (at least mine) don't need to end up at the hive or where they began.

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.