Verwandte Artikel zu Understanding Jazz, with Audio-CD: Ways to Listen....

Understanding Jazz, with Audio-CD: Ways to Listen. Forew. by Wynton Marsalis - Hardcover

Piazza, Tom

 
9781400063697: Understanding Jazz, with Audio-CD: Ways to Listen. Forew. by Wynton Marsalis

Inhaltsangabe

A definitive and entertaining tour of the world of jazz music combines an informative analysis of the principles, styles, and techniques of jazz with a companion CD featuring performances by such legendary musicians as Miles Davis, Dizzy Gillespie, and Duke Ellington. 20,000 first printing.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Tom Piazza is the author of seven books, including the ASCAP Deems Taylor Award-winning The Guide To Classic Recorded Jazz and the widely acclaimed novel My Cold War. A graduate of the Iowa Writers’ Workshop, he has written for The New York Times, The Atlantic, Oxford American, and many other publications. He is the recipient of a James Michener Fellowship in Fiction and a 2004 Grammy Award for his album notes to Martin Scorsese Presents: The Blues–a Musical Journey. He may be visited at www.tompiazza.com.

Wynton Marsalis is the artistic director of Jazz at Lincoln Center. Marsalis has won nine Grammy awards and his oratorio on slavery and freedom, Blood on the Fields, became the first and, to date, only jazz composition to win the Pulitzer Prize in music.

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Chapter 1

One

Foreground and Background

Although it is possible to play jazz music solo (especially on the piano, where one can accompany oneself), most jazz music is played by groups of musicians. Jazz is always, as the great pianist Bill Evans once remarked, “a social situation”; it involves a number of musicians speaking a shared language, but with highly individual sensibilities.

One of the first questions to ask in trying to understand any social situation is, How is it organized? That is, what are the implicit or explicit ground rules that guide the interactions among the members? If we look at the history of jazz, we see an astonishing variety of answers to this question. But underneath those answers run some common threads.

In jazz, or in most music of any type, there is usually some kind of relationship between a lead voice, or voices—whether instrumental or vocal—and an accompaniment, just as in representational painting there is some relationship between the objects that are the main focus of interest and all

the elements that populate the space around those objects. Another way of putting this might be to say that there is a relationship between the voice of the individual and the voice(s) of the community in which the individual operates.

That relationship, or set of relationships, has taken many forms in jazz. It might exist between a clearly defined lead voice and clearly defined accompanists, such as that between Sonny Rollins’s tenor saxophone lead and the accompaniment of the piano, bass, and drums on “Moritat” (track 4 on the accompanying CD); or it might be a somewhat more entwined, symbiotic relationship, like that between Stan Getz’s tenor saxophone and Kenny Barron’s piano on “I Can’t Get Started” (track 5); or it might be a solo horn against a written-out ensemble accompaniment, as in the collaboration between Dizzy Gillespie’s trumpet and the Duke Ellington Orchestra on “U.M.M.G.” (track 3); or any number of other permutations.

Jazz is a music of highly individual sensibilities. A jazz ensemble consists not just of different instruments but of the different, contrasting musical personalities of its players. Much of the craft that jazz musicians acquire is there to help them develop an unmistakable voice. And a jazz group is organized to give those

individual voices the greatest possible opportunity to express themselves while still being coordinated as an ensemble. The group effect depends on the tension among its individual sensibilities.

In fact, even though much jazz places heavy emphasis on the improvisations of a soloist, it is good to learn how to listen to all the instruments in an ensemble at once, to learn to hear the entire group as an interdependent organism. A soloist doesn’t exist in a vacuum; the soloist will be responding to everything that is happening while he or she is improvising, just as the accompanists will be responding not only to the soloist but to one another, in an ongoing conversation. The pianist will respond to the drummer’s rhythmic accents, the soloist will hear the chords the pianist plays and react harmonically, and so on. The best jazz will reward one's listening to it as if to a unified field of sound, with shifting foreground and background elements.

In jazz’s New Orleans beginnings, this fact sits at the center of the music. In classic New Orleans jazz, such as that heard in King Oliver’s recording of “Weather Bird Rag” (track 1), there is less made of the distinction between the solo voice and the background than there is in some other types of jazz. Jazz in its early days in New Orleans was the product of a tightly knit yet varied community, and in a sense the music reflects the kinds of situations in which it was used—street parades, dances, community celebrations. Each voice in the group contributes to an overall sound composed of individuals celebrating the same occasion, each in his or her own way. Each horn, rather than playing an individual solo in series, simultaneously plays a series of spontaneous variations on the same theme, organized in a very specific way.

In fact, contemporary ears may be so used to hearing a sharp distinction between foreground and background, between a solo voice and its accompaniment, that a performance such as “Weather Bird Rag” may come as something of a shock. In it, almost every instrumental voice, certainly every wind instrument, seems to be in the foreground at the same time.

King Oliver’s Creole Jazz Band was one of the greatest ensembles in jazz history, and it represented the high-water mark of classic New Orleans–style jazz. With its “front line” of two cornets, trombone, and clarinet, and accompaniment by piano, banjo, and drummer Baby Dodds playing woodblocks, it generated an irresistible momentum as well as a profound equilibrium, one in which all the parts contributed to the totality of sound. Recorded in 1923, “Weather Bird Rag” captures the Oliver band at a period when they were influencing every young musician in Chicago, where they presided at the Lincoln Gardens. The leader, cornetist Joseph “King” Oliver, was one of the great instrumentalists to come out of New Orleans, and he surrounded himself with many of the best younger players, especially his protégé, the very young Louis Armstrong. Armstrong, in fact, plays cornet alongside Oliver on “Weather Bird Rag,” which is Armstrong’s composition as well.

Once our ears get used to the limited acoustic range, we can hear something like a musical miracle in progress. All the musicians are playing at once, each is playing something different, and yet the music doesn’t sound chaotic. There is a unified effect consisting of very disparate elements. How is this possible?

The New Orleans musicians achieved this alchemy in part by adhering to a specific division of labor among the wind instruments. In the classic New Orleans ensemble, as exemplified by the Oliver band and other early ensembles such as the Original Dixieland Jazz Band and the New Orleans Rhythm Kings, those instruments are typically the trumpet (or cornet), the trombone, and the clarinet. Each is assigned a role in which it contributes a distinct element to the overall musical texture. Within these respective roles there is considerable room for spontaneous variation, or improvisation, but the difference in the nature of each contribution keeps the overall texture from becoming muddy or jumbled. Simply put, here is how they divide things up.

In a New Orleans band, the trumpet or cornet will typically play the main melody, or the lead. The trumpet fills this role for two basic reasons. Being made of brass, the trumpet is very loud—it can be heard over what everyone else is playing—and it is pitched more or less in the range of the human voice, which makes it ideal for, in a sense, “singing” the melody.

The trombone, also made of brass, is also very loud, but it is pitched lower than the trumpet; it sits more naturally in a chestier, more guttural register. It is less flexible than the trumpet in terms of execution, due to the necessity of using the slide, a somewhat awkward way of achieving different pitches compared to the trumpet’s valves, which are worked with three fingers and can be manipulated more fluidly. So, due to its somewhat cumbersome quality and its lower range, the trombone tends to...

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.