Refutation of the Argument a Priori for the Being and Attributes of God (Classic Reprint): Showing the Irrelevancy of That Argument, as Well as the ... Gillespie, in Support of It (Classic Reprint) - Softcover

Inhaltsangabe

Critique of a famous theological argument from first principles A sharp, sustained examination of the so‑called argument from necessity for the existence of God. It questions the logic, definitions, and use of abstract ideas in classic proofs.

In this detailed analysis, the author probes the premises behind the claim that a necessary being or infinite extension must exist. The work compares different positions, exposes logical missteps, and challenges the idea that mathematical terms can determine metaphysical truth. It reads like a rigorous debate that tests how theories of existence, space, and duration should be understood in theology and philosophy.

• Clear, point‑by‑point critique of the a priori case for God’s being and attributes


• Discussion of how terms like necessity, substratum, and infinity are used in metaphysical argument


• Evaluation of the roles of space, time, and substance in challenging traditional proofs


• Accessible, logical reasoning aimed at readers interested in philosophy of religion

Ideal for readers of skeptical philosophy and early modern religious philosophy, who want a thoughtful, exacting counterpoint to established proofs.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.