Lay Baptism Invalid (Classic Reprint): Or, an Essay to Prove That Such Baptism Is Null and Void, When Administered in Opposition to the Divine Right ... the Apostolical Succession (Classic Reprint) - Softcover

Inhaltsangabe

Is a baptism performed outside the apostolic succession truly valid? This work argues that baptism given by unauthorized or non‑ordained ministers is not valid, drawing on ancient church debates to explain how Tradition and ordained authority shape the Sacrament.

From the early church to later councils, the text surveys competing opinions about who may administer baptism and what counts as a true, valid rite. It discusses figures like Cyprian and others who insisted that baptism must be linked to proper church authority and continuous apostolic practice. The discussion weighs the influence of traditional practice against innovative or lay‑driven baptisms, and it shows how these arguments influenced Ecclesial policy in antiquity.

Readers will encounter concrete arguments about the necessity of ordained ministry, the role of tradition, and the limits of lay administration. The material illuminates how faith communities distinguished legitimate rites from those they deemed irregular, and why this distinction mattered for the integrity of the church.

• Foundational questions about who can administer baptism and why


• Key positions from early church writers and councils


• Connections between apostolic succession, ordination, and sacramental validity


• How tradition and Scripture were used to evaluate baptisms from different communities

Ideal for readers of church history, ecclesiastical law, and Anglican doctrine seeking a focused look at historic debates over baptism and succession.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.