Program Evaluation in Practice: Core Concepts and Examples for Discussion and Analysis (Research Methods for the Social Sciences) - Softcover

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Dean T. Spaulding is a professional evaluator and also serves on the faculty at the College of Saint Rose in Albany, New York in the Department of Educational Psychology, where he teaches educational research methodology and program evaluation. He is a coauthor of Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice from Jossey-Bass.

Von der hinteren Coverseite

Program Evaluation in Practice, Second Edition

The second edition of Program Evaluation in Practice covers the core concepts of program evaluation and uses case studies to touch on real-world issues that arise when conducting an evaluation project. This important resource is filled with illustrative examples written in accessible terms and provides a wide variety of evaluation projects that can be used for discussion, analysis, and reflection. The book addresses foundations and theories of evaluation, tools and methods for collecting data, writing of reports, and the sharing of findings. The discussion questions and class activities at the end of each chapter are designed to help process the information in that chapter and to integrate the information from the other chapters, thus facilitating the learning process. As useful for students as it is for evaluators in training, Program Evaluation in Practice is a must-have text for those aspiring to be effective evaluators.

This new and updated edition of Program Evaluation in Practice

• Expands discussion of the basic theories and approaches to program evaluation
• Includes a new chapter on objectives-based evaluation and a new section on ethics in program evaluation
• Provides more detailed information and in-depth description for each case, including
• • The main evaluation approaches or theories being addressed
  • Fresh references and new readings
  • The new Joint Committee Standards for Evaluation and makes clear the connection between the material presented and the new standards
  • More background information about the evaluators in the cases