You Don't Say - Softcover

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Long ago in the early days of television, when screens were tiny and the colors were only black and white, one of the networks was Du Mont and one of its programs was the New York Times Youth Forum. This once-a-week panel show featured six students from around the country discussing national issues. On Sunday, February 1, 1953 the question was "Can We Maintain Ethics in Government?" and one of the panelists was teenager Fred Gielow.

He recalls, "I can't remember much about our discussion, but I vividly recall taking issue with the basic premise of the program. I questioned how ethics could be 'Maintained,' if as I suspected, ethics were largely 'absent' to begin with. Such an attitude wasn't much appreciated by moderator Dorothy Gordon or special guest Ellis Arnall, former Governor of Georgia."

That television debut and debate may have planted a political seed in Fred's subsconsciousness, but if so, it certainly remained dormant for a long time. Long enough for him to finish school, get a job, marry, raise a family, even retire, before germinating. But now that seed has blossomed into a full-time interest as his recent appearances on local radio programs, his co-hosted public-access television interview show, and now this book attest.

"There are many sources of truth to refute what liberals and the mainstream media tell us," says Fred, "but you have to dig around a little to find them. If you really expect both sides of an issue to be fully and fairly presented in the major newspapers and magazines and on television, I'd say you've bought into the mainstream media scam. You're a victim of the Propaganda Machine. But, sadly, it appear you're in the majority. The media seem to be winning their clever con game."

Fred continues: "I wrote this book to present a perspective that seems to go largely unnoticed in the U.S. today. It's a real tragedy when lies are regularly masqueraded as the truth. What's even more tragic is when a majority of the public buys into the big deception, or worse, yet, when the public doesn't even care.

"By using quotations direct from the mouths of liberals, quotations generally unreported by the mighty Propaganda Machine, I think it's possible to demonstrate the kind of world our liberal friends wish to impose upon the rest of us. It takes but a few remarks, during rare, unguarded moments, for liberals to vividly and unambiguously show their true colors."

Von der hinteren Coverseite

The liberal agenda includes world government (which will tolerate little to no U.S. interference), a world military (which will enter the U.S. at whim to quell a disturbance), a world court (which will impose law without U.S. Constitutional protections), world taxes (which will seize our money to redistribute to Third-World countries), and a world religion (Gaia be praised).

Besides shattering our sovereignty, the liberal agenda includes dumbing down our kids, violating our right to own handguns, confiscating private property, encouraging deviant sexual behavior, imposing population controls, favoring plants and animals over humans, justifying moral relativism, and strengthening oppressive central-government control.

This is the "utopia" liberals describe with their own words in "You Don't Say."

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

You may be thinking to yourself: I wonder why I didn't read those quotations by prominent liberals in my local newspaper or see them reported on television. You can imagine the attention they would have received had they been uttered or written by conservatives! The Propaganda Machine would have risen up in righteous indignation, to give glaring publicity to such outrages. The ranting and raving would last for weeks. Maybe Months. But when foolish or unreasonable thought originates with liberals, the Propaganda Machine concludes such utterances are wholly unnewsworthy. Apparently liberal nonsense is "protected" speech, while conservative nonsense is heralded and harangued with hoots or horror! But what's worse, far worse: Suppose when a liberal makes an assertion as offensive as many of those reproduced here, suppose he or she really means it! Suppose liberals are indeed in favor of expanded government and contracted freedom. Suppose they favor giving preference to bugs, swamps, and weeds over the needs, even lives of human beings. Suppose they consider property rights dispensable. Suppose these people willingly, eagerly embrace socialism and communism as replacements for capitalism.

If you listen closely to their rhetoric, I'm afraid you'll find many of our liberal friends are indeed willing, often anxious, to relinquish our freedom, the most precious gift ever bestowed upon a people, to an omnipotent government, and to allow this nation's proud and honorable citizens to be transformed into servitude.