The Improbable First Century of Cosmopolitan Magazine: Volume 1 - Hardcover

Landers, James

 
9780826219060: The Improbable First Century of Cosmopolitan Magazine: Volume 1

Inhaltsangabe

Today, monthly issues of Cosmopolitan magazine scream out to readers from checkout counters and newsstands. With bright covers and bold, sexy headlines, this famous periodical targets young, single women aspiring to become the quintessential “Cosmo girl.” Cosmopolitan is known for its vivacious character and frank, explicit attitude toward sex, yet because of its reputation, many people don’t realize that the magazine has undergone many incarnations before its current one, including family literary magazine and muckraking investigative journal, and all are presented in The Improbable First Century of Cosmopolitan Magazine. The book boasts one particularly impressive contributor: Helen Gurley Brown herself, who rarely grants interviews but spoke and corresponded with James Landers to aid in his research.
            When launched in 1886, Cosmopolitan was a family literary magazine that published quality fiction, children’s stories, and homemaking tips. In 1889 it was rescued from bankruptcy by wealthy entrepreneur John Brisben Walker, who introduced illustrations and attracted writers such as Mark Twain, Willa Cather, and H. G. Wells. Then, when newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst purchased Cosmopolitan in 1905, he turned it into a purveyor of exposé journalism to aid his personal political pursuits. But when Hearst abandoned those ambitions, he changed the magazine in the 1920s back to a fiction periodical featuring leading writers such as Theodore Dreiser, Sinclair Lewis, and William Somerset Maugham. His approach garnered success by the 1930s, but poor editing sunk Cosmo’s readership as decades went on. By the mid-1960s executives considered letting Cosmopolitan die, but Helen Gurley Brown, an ambitious and savvy businesswoman, submitted a plan for a dramatic editorial makeover. Gurley Brown took the helm and saved Cosmopolitan by publishing articles about topics other women’s magazines avoided. Twenty years later, when the magazine ended its first century, Cosmopolitan was the profit center of the Hearst Corporation and a culturally significant force in young women’s lives.
            The Improbable First Century of Cosmopolitan Magazine explores how Cosmopolitan survived three near-death experiences to become one of the most dynamic and successful magazines of the twentieth century. Landers uses a wealth of primary source materials to place this important magazine in the context of history and depict how it became the cultural touchstone it is today. This book will be of interest not only to modern Cosmo aficionadas but also to journalism students, news historians, and anyone interested in publishing.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

James Landers is Associate Professor in the Department of Journalism and Technical Communications at Colorado State University. He is the author of The Weekly War: Newsmagazines and Vietnam (University of Missouri Press).

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

The Improbable First Century of Cosmopolitan Magazine

By JAMES LANDERS

University of Missouri Press

Copyright © 2010 The Curators of the University of Missouri
All right reserved.

ISBN: 978-0-8262-1906-0

Contents

Preface...............................vii1. Creation...........................12. Salvation..........................363. Competition........................714. Distraction........................1045. Sensation..........................1256. Consolidation......................1727. Transition.........................2118. Transformation.....................2259. Celebration........................26910. Continuation......................295Notes.................................299Bibliography..........................329Index.................................345

Chapter One

Creation

May 888, Rochester, New York

At noon on a Tuesday late in the month, twenty-eight men met for a hastily scheduled conference at the downtown Powers Hotel. They sat at tables in an ornate reception room adorned with candlesticks and chandeliers for festive occasions, but these local businessmen had convened to learn the extent of their financial loss from the sudden bankruptcy of Schlicht & Field Company. A manufacturer and international distributor of office equipment based in Rochester, Schlicht & Field somehow owed banks and creditors $301,400 it could not pay.

Reaction among the businessmen to details about the reasons for the bankruptcy varied from astonishment to anxiety to outrage. Many men in the room owned stock in Schlicht & Field, their certificates now worthless—and because the men had pledged their company stock as surety for tens of thousands of dollars in bank loans they were liable personally for much of the debt. Several men at the meeting held promissory notes from the company, their value now zero. Some creditors attended, too, their bills for services and supplies now worth pennies on the dollar. Seven bankers also were in the room, their role to tally company assets consisting of warehouse inventory and ownership of numerous patents for various desk drawer and desktop devices essential to filing and recordkeeping for nineteenth-century businesses. Everyone knew the assets would not cover much of the debt.

How had this happened? The only man with an answer was absent. Paul Schlicht, at age twenty-nine the president of the company, had refused to attend. His absence dismayed some at the conference; they "thought it strange," while others there might "draw their own inferences" why Schlicht had stayed away, according to a newspaper article published the same day. So, instead of an explanation from Schlicht, whose deception and mismanagement had bankrupted the company, a bookkeeper from the nearby corporate office told stockholders, creditors, and bankers what had happened. His blunt explanation was that a subsidiary venture of Schlicht & Field—a monthly magazine, The Cosmopolitan—had bled the company dry. "The magazine had been a failure," the newspaper reported. "It had lost $130,000."

Not only had the magazine failed, taking with it the direct expenditure of a sizable sum, but Schlicht had given away thousands of items from the company's inventory to induce people to subscribe. Then he had stopped paying providers of services and supplies to Schlicht & Field because Cosmopolitan needed the money to survive. However, the most stunning revelation at the May conference was that Schlicht & Field had not owned Cosmopolitan for months. A secret transaction by Schlicht in late January had transferred ownership of the magazine—without any payment to the Rochester company—to a new publisher located in Manhattan, and Schlicht had become one of the partners.

Since the debut of Cosmopolitan two years earlier as a literary magazine for the family, Schlicht & Field had supported its creation and publication of twenty-five issues. The disastrous venture began with $95,000 borrowed from banks. Stockholders authorized the bank loans for the magazine upon review of a plan submitted by Schlicht, who anointed himself publisher. According to the plan presented to stockholders, revenue from subscribers and advertisers eventually would enable Cosmopolitan to operate independently. The banks accepted surety notes signed by stockholders, the majority of them proprietors of Rochester businesses.

All of them soon would learn that magazine publishing was more unpredictable than selling office supplies. Schlicht encountered the harsh reality of the intensely competitive magazine marketplace of the Gilded Age. Cosmopolitan's startup proved costlier than predicted. Door-to-door canvassing for potential subscribers in cities from New England through the Midwest was expensive to organize and coordinate, fees to illustrators and writers exceeded budget, and occasional color for frontispieces inflated the original printing estimate. Despite a substantial amount of capital for its creation, Cosmopolitan required more money just months after its appearance. Schlicht persuaded several company stockholders to provide an additional sum in return for promissory notes. This supplemental investment of $67,000 did not last long either.

Schlicht & Field was in a bind. Revenue derived from its core business of manufacturing and selling clipboards, desk-drawer organizers, desktop file boxes, file dividers, file holders, paper hole-punchers, and typewriters to office customers across the nation simultaneously financed the company's operations and the magazine's persistent deficit. Bills for services and supplies went unpaid.

The first indication to stockholders of a crisis surfaced near the end of 1887. Schlicht asked them for another $50,000 to help Cosmopolitan. He assured them the magazine was popular, and that subscriptions and advertisements were increasing each month. Schlicht told stockholders that Cosmopolitan distributed 35,000 copies to subscribers and vendors, compared with an initial distribution of 20,000 copies. Stockholders at the bankruptcy conference in May remembered Schlicht then telling them "all that was needed was a little time and money." They agreed to sign another batch of surety notes to secure the additional money from banks.

Why these presumably sensible Rochester businessmen, including Edward Bausch and Carl Lomb of Bausch and Lomb Optical Company, continued to underwrite Cosmopolitan cannot be determined from the historical record. Perhaps it was Schlicht's persuasive personality, or perhaps it was the unique status conferred by association with a new national magazine, one known for its quality fiction, poetry, and illustrations. Or maybe it was the prospect of a lucrative return on their investment.

Cosmopolitan survived on cash siphoned from Schlicht & Field for two more months. Schlicht then enticed several investors in New York City, including Ulysses S. Grant Jr., the late president's son, to assume responsibility for the magazine's finances from that point onward, leaving Schlicht & Field responsible for prior debts. Some confusion ensued at the bankruptcy conference in May concerning ownership of Cosmopolitan because stockholders were unaware of the ownership transfer and could not understand how Schlicht arranged it. Incorporation documents for the new ownership entity filed January 1888 in Albany did not list any prior connection to the Rochester company.

Although the January transaction had relieved further financial burden on Schlicht & Field, it was too late. The company remained responsible...

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.