Verwandte Artikel zu The Money Men: The Real Story of Fund-Raising's...

The Money Men: The Real Story of Fund-Raising's Influence on Political Power in America - Hardcover

Birnbaum, Jeffrey H.

 
9780812931198: The Money Men: The Real Story of Fund-Raising's Influence on Political Power in America
Hardcover
ISBN 10: 081293119X ISBN 13: 9780812931198
Verlag: Random House USA Inc, 2000

Inhaltsangabe

A revealing look inside the workings of power in American government focuses on the new deal brokers--the people who raise campaign money and the contributors who expect access and even favors in return for their support. 25,000 first printing.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Jeffrey H. Birnbaum, an award-winning author and journalist, is currently the Washington bureau chief of <i>Fortune</i> magazine. He is also the author of three acclaimed works: <b>Showdown at Gucci Gulch</b>, with Alan S. Murray; <b>The Lobbyists</b>; and <b>Madhouse</b>: <b>The Private Turmoil of Working for the President</b>. He has been a regular panelist on Washington Week in Review and is a contributor to the Fox News Channel. He lives outside Washington, D.C.

Aus dem Klappentext

itical campaigns in America begin with the money men.<br><br>If you assume that fund-raising is so distasteful that you don't want to hear any more about it, you are closing your mind to one of the most fundamental and fascinating stories in American politics, writes Jeffrey H. Birnbaum, author of <b>The Money Men</b>. For the past two decades, Birnbaum has followed the money in Washington, as a reporter for <i>The Wall Street Journal</i>, <i>Time</i>, and <i>Fortune</i>. In his <i>Washington Post</i> bestsellers, <b>Showdown at Gucci Gulch</b> and <b>The Lobbyists</b>, Birnbaum examined the forces that wield power in our capital and the subtle yet influential interplay between pressure groups and politicians. Now, Birnbaum takes us inside the world of the most elite, powerful, and little-known groups in politics: the fund-raisers and fund-givers who have an increasingly large say in the way our government works.<br><br>If you want to be taken seri

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Almost everyone who works in official Washington eventually has what can be described as the Moment: that  instant when they finally realize that money plays too big a role in politics, way too big. Not that it's a surprise. No one can possibly be happy with a system that compels politicians to spend a third of their time begging for contributions. Yet it's still a shock to see the bazaar up close. It's one thing to know and another to see with your own eyes. It makes a difference.

One of my friends experienced his Moment in the mid-1980s when he worked as a press secretary for a southern congressman. At the time, the lawmaker was a hot commodity: He was undecided on whether to vote to fund construction of the B-1 bomber. The Reagan administration, frantic for support, wanted his backing very badly, so White House aides were eager to bargain. In a meeting one day, my friend witnessed the deal as it was struck. The congressman pledged to vote to fund the aircraft in exchange for a VIP tour of the White House for twenty or thirty of his largest and most loyal campaign contributors. The congressman didn't ask for a new dam or a new road or a new grant to help his neediest constituents. Instead, he traded his greatest power, his vote on the House floor, to please the handful of people who really matter to him: the money men who were so key to his reelection.

Campaign cash, and lots of it, buys advertisements that, in turn, lure voters to the polls. The more money, the more votes. It's that simple and that venal. Money talks, at least on TV and radio. And the candidate who can put more of his or her ads onto the public airwaves (and local cable channels) has the better chance of winning. Period.

That's why lawmakers and executive-branch appointees assist their moneyed constituents whenever they think they can get away with it. They can't always, of course, and big donors are sometimes losers in the game of legislation. Still, it is the rare lawmaker who doesn't keep handy -- or at least keep in mind -- the list of his or her best financial friends. When they call, they are listened to. And conversely, when the lawmakers call them, the donors jump. (Lawmakers often demand contributions, which to the givers seem more like shakedowns.) In any case, it's a symbiotic--or, more accurately, a parasitic -- relationship that absorbs too much of our leaders' attention. It also is part of a deeply ingrained system that's as difficult to fix as it is horrific to behold.

But behold it we must. On the threshold of a presidential election, the time is right to focus on this important corner of public policy. We all know vaguely that something is wrong in Washington, especially with its money culture. I hope to show how the money chase works and, in some cases, how we think it works but doesn't really. Only then can we think clearly about how we can -- and cannot -- change it for the better.

Washington is awash in campaign cash. It has flooded over the gunwales of the ship of state and threatens to sink the entire vessel. Political donations determine the course and speed of many government actions that -- though we often forget -- will deeply affect our daily lives. The deluge of dollars pouring into lobbying and elections is one of the main reasons Americans are turned off by Washington and its arcane ways.

Like so much of what goes on in the nation's capital, fundraising is widely misunderstood. Yes, political giving in its many forms is hugely important. And yes, all of us would be better off if a lot of political giving had never seeped into the system. Yet not all donations are offered for nefarious purposes, nor do they always lead to nefarious ends. In fact, the individuals or groups that give the most don't always win. The relationship between contributions and government action is much more complicated than mere quids and quos.

One thing is clear. Political giving is raging like wildfire. George W. Bush shattered all records in his run for president. Indeed, the combination of a surging stock market and huge political stakes have made 2000 the Year of the Firehose. Campaign cash is gushing everywhere now, but the situation has been developing for many years. In one out of six congressional races in 1998 at least one of the candidates spent one million dollars. That was ninety-four candidates in seventy-six congressional districts. Just a decade earlier, only ten House candidates reached the million-dollar mark. The last presidential election cycle cost just over two billion dollars, a record. This time, expect the first three-billion-dollar campaign.

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Verlag
Random House USA Inc
Erscheinungsdatum
2000
Sprache
Englisch
ISBN 10 
081293119X
ISBN 13 
9780812931198
Einband
Gebundene Ausgabe
Auflage
1
Anzahl der Seiten
287
Kontakt zum Hersteller
Nicht verfügbar
Verantwortliche Person
MUSIC STORE professional GmbH
022188841282
Lars.Mueller@musicstore.de

Istanbulstr. 22-26
Köln
51103
Deutschland