Verwandte Artikel zu The Politics of Opera: A History from Monteverdi to...

The Politics of Opera: A History from Monteverdi to Mozart - Hardcover

Cohen, Mitchell

 
9780691175027: The Politics of Opera: A History from Monteverdi to Mozart

Inhaltsangabe

The Politics of Opera takes readers on a fascinating journey into the entwined development of opera and politics, from the Renaissance through the turn of the nineteenth century. What political backdrops have shaped opera? How has opera conveyed the political ideas of its times? Delving into European history and thought and an array of music by such greats as Lully, Rameau, and Mozart, Mitchell Cohen reveals how politics - through story lines, symbols, harmonies, and musical motifs - has played an operatic role both robust and sotto voce. An engrossing book that will interest all who love opera and are intrigued by politics, The Politics of Opera offers a compelling investigation into the intersections of music and the state.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Mitchell Cohen is professor of political science at Baruch College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York and editor emeritus of Dissent magazine. His books include Zion and State and The Wager of Lucien Goldmann (Princeton). His writing has appeared in such publications as the New York Times and the Times Literary Supplement. He lives in New York City.

Von der hinteren Coverseite

"A tour de force. This is a lively and engaging account of the history of politics in opera, written with precision and grace. Vividly rendered, sweeping in scope, and a pleasure to read, Cohen's book is an astonishing achievement."--Julie Otsuka, author of The Buddha in the Attic

"In The Politics of Opera, Cohen brings a music lover's avidity and scholar's lucidity to the ever-changing relationship between the operatic stage and the political world. His invigorating book gives art and ideology their due--a rare achievement. Cohen zeroes in on the political and social pressures that shape an artist's choices, but he never denies the transformative power of the creative imagination. His easy command of the crossroads where art and politics meet bears comparison with Irving Howe's classic Politics and the Novel."--Jed Perl, author of Magicians and Charlatans: Essays on Art and Culture

"To say that The Politics of Opera is a remarkable achievement would be to give no sense of the magnitude of the undertaking, the challenge of writing a work that does justice not only to the political underpinnings of opera, but also to its music, drama, dramaturgy, and singers. This is an important cultural history and Cohen is a brilliant guide."--Richard Kramer, author of Cherubino's Leap and Unfinished Music

"In The Politics of Opera, Cohen offers a new reading of libretti and musical theory informed by his excellent knowledge of the history of political thought. To my knowledge there is no similar book covering these questions in such depth or wide geographical breadth. This was a pleasure to read."--Nicole Reinhardt, Durham University (UK)

"Extremely erudite, this book is beautifully crafted. Its powerful prose evokes wonderful images throughout and brings the early history of opera close to the reader. Almost every page shows the author's immense intellectual range."--Axel Körner, University College London

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

The Politics of Opera

A History from Monteverdi to Mozart

By Mitchell Cohen

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS

Copyright © 2017 Mitchell Cohen
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-691-17502-7

Contents

List of Illustrations, ix,
Prologue: Mixtures, Boundaries, Parallels, xiii,
Acknowledgments, xxxi,
PART 1: METAMORPHOSES, ANCIENT TO MODERN,
CHAPTER 1 Who Rules?, 3,
CHAPTER 2 Reigning Voices, 18,
Intermedio (I), 37,
CHAPTER 3 Laws and Laurels, 40,
PART 2: MANTUA TO VENICE,
CHAPTER 4 Orpheus's Ways, 55,
Intermedio (II), 64,
CHAPTER 5 A Prince Decides on Naxos, 71,
Intermedio (III), 81,
CHAPTER 6 The Political Scenario of Monteverdi's Venice, 84,
CHAPTER 7 Revealing Ulysses, 101,
Intermedio (IV), 119,
CHAPTER 8 Spectacles, 124,
PART 3: UNDER FRENCH SUNS,
CHAPTER 9 Agitations and Absolutes, 143,
CHAPTER 10 In the Winds: The Decades of Pernucio and Telemachus, 167,
Un court intermède, 188,
CHAPTER 11 Vertical, Horizontal, 197,
CHAPTER 12 Nature and Its Discontents, 216,
PART 4: ANCIENTS IN MODERNITY,
CHAPTER 13 From Elysium to Utica, 225,
Zwischenspiel (I), 244,
CHAPTER 14 From Crete to Rome, 252,
PART 5: "... AND ALTHOUGH I AM NO COUNT ...",
CHAPTER 15 Masters and Servants, 267,
Zwischenspiel (II), 292,
CHAPTER 16 Gaits of History, 301,
CHAPTER 17 Looking for Enlightenment, 335,
CHAPTER 18 Tamino's Wonder, 353,
Sarastro's Sabbatical: This Is Not a Finale, 373,
Appendix: "Backstage", 391,
Notes, 407,
Select Bibliography, 449,
Index, 465,


CHAPTER 1

WHO RULES?


Were political ideas embedded in the first operas? If so, what were they and what did they imply? What does the political world in which opera was born tell us about this art form? What do operas tell us about politics? To approach these questions, we turn first not to words and music bound together for the stage, but to a wedding celebration.

The couple didn't marry for love. They wed out of political duty. It was in Florence in the autumn of 1600 that Maria de' Medici, niece of Tuscany's Grand Duke Ferdinando I, became the queen of France's King Henri IV. Their union fortified a partnership between Florence and Paris against Savoy and, in the larger picture of European politics, it strengthened them both against the Habsburg rulers of Spain (with whom Henri had recently been at war) and the Holy Roman Empire.

Spanish imperial power had grown throughout the fragmented political world of the Italian peninsula in the mid-sixteenth century. Ferdinando I had altered past Tuscan policies aiming to balance Spanish power with increased French power. In this context, he had recognized the value to Tuscany of Henri of Navarre's struggle to attain the French throne. By the time Henri, the Huguenot-turned-Catholic, married Maria, he was both King Henri IV and indebted financially and politically to her relatives. Florence's ruling clan and premier banking family supported him in French power struggles. Negotiations for a connubial alliance, with a suitably large dowry, had gone on for some eight years.

The groom didn't come to the ceremony. He was engaged elsewhere — against the troops of Savoy's Duke Carlo Emanuele I. Henri IV's love interests were elsewhere as well, with his mistress, and not with reputedly tempestuous Maria. He sent a surrogate for the nuptials in Florence's cathedral on October 5. The king missed a lavish occasion, the sort of display that princely families gave to promote their prestige at home and abroad. The banquet at Palazzo Vecchio (the old municipal citadel that had once been the seat of Florence's republic) was opulent. Each dish comprised part of an allegory extolling the illustrious couple and their kin. Icing on the cake was molded as a wintry landscape. Sugar-animals moved about on it, and changed shape. Two hundred and thirty-three years later this "vast magnificence" on which "no expenses were spared" was presented as the "most distinguished occurrence" in the reign of Ferdinando I in a history written by Lorenzo L. Da Ponte, the son of Mozart's librettist, then a professor of Italian literature at a college in New York.

Henri IV also missed a milestone in Western culture. A variety of public and private events celebrated the new union. The principal theme was universal peace. The Abduction of Cephalus by Gabriello Chiabrera with accompanying music by Giulio Caccini — most of it is lost — played at the Uffizi Theater. More important historically was Eurydice — Euridice in the original — which is often called the second opera. These works originated in efforts within Florentine circles to marry words, music, and tale in a new way. Euridice was performed on Friday, October 6, on the second floor of the Pitti Palace, the duke's official residence, in the rooms of a Medici family member. It recounted how mythic Orpheus, armed only with his famous voice and his lyre, braved the Underworld to retrieve his love. Poor Eurydice, the treenymph, had died of snakebite on their wedding day. The performance, the first that could be called public, was a present to the new queen from Jacopo Corsi, a nobleman, patron of the arts, and longtime champion of marriage between Henri and Maria. (It had probably been completed by the previous spring because there had been a performance of it in May, also in a salon at the Pitti Palace, at the request of the archduchess.) The librettist, Ottavio Rinuccini, was a Florentine court poet. Jacopo Peri, a musician and singer who played a vibrant role in Florentine commercial life and served in a wide variety of Florentine governmental and legal offices, composed most of the music, although segments were by Caccini. The latter, Peri's archcompetitor, was also known as "Giulio Romano" because he was born and had studied in Rome (Caccini rushed to put into print his own musical setting of the libretto within two months of the performance.)

Dafne, usually credited as the first opera, was an earlier Corsi-RinucciniPeri effort based on another myth. A small audience saw it in Corsi's palazzo during Carnival 1597–98. Corsi and his collaborators were men of the late Renaissance, and they aimed to create a contemporary counterpart to ancient Greek tragedy. Their experiment was also one result of several decades of discussion of music within the Florentine artistic and intellectual worlds; these, in turn, corresponded to historical and political transformations in Florence and, more broadly, Europe. While Euridice was published, most of Dafne's music is lost. We do have descriptions of Dafne's first presentation. "It was performed in a small room and sung privately" with "a consort of instruments" playing, one observer recalled years later. "I was stunned at this marvel." The entire work was sung through with musical accompaniment. Its novelty was a kind of musical declamation or declamatory song that later evolved into the conventions of recitative. Another witness, the composer Marco da Gagliano (he reset the libretto to his own music in 1608), commented that the experiment showed to Rinuccini "how apt song was to express all kinds of emotions," and that it could lead "to incredible delight."

But it was Euridice, some two years later, that effectively launched the new art form.

It is improbable that Euridice's audience, estimated at two hundred people, mostly noble, recognized the evening's...

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.