We are partial to people with whom we share special relationships--if someone is your child, parent, or friend, you wouldn't treat them as you would a stranger. But is partiality justified, and if so, why? Partiality presents a theory of the reasons supporting special treatment within special relationships and explores the vexing problem of how we might reconcile the moral value of these relationships with competing claims of impartial morality.
Simon Keller explains that in order to understand why we give special treatment to our family and friends, we need to understand how people come to matter in their own rights. Keller first presents two main accounts of partiality: the projects view, on which reasons of partiality arise from the place that people take within our lives and our commitments, and the relationships view, on which relationships themselves contain fundamental value or reason-giving force. Keller then argues that neither view is satisfactory because neither captures the experience of acting well within special relationships. Instead, Keller defends the individuals view, on which reasons of partiality arise from the value of the individuals with whom our relationships are shared. He defends this view by saying that we must accept that two people, whether friend or stranger, can have the same value, even as their value makes different demands upon people with whom they share different relationships. Keller explores the implications of this claim within a wider understanding of morality and our relationships with groups, institutions, and countries.
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Simon Keller is associate professor of philosophy at Victoria University, Wellington. He is the author of The Limits of Loyalty.
"Keller's engaging book makes an important contribution to a critical issue in ethical theory. He presents a tremendously succinct presentation of the views."--Diane Jeske, University of Iowa
"Partiality is about the nature and source of our reasons for partiality--a central but controversial area of the moral domain. Keller develops a novel account of these reasons, nested in an elegant taxonomy of rival perspectives and illustrated by a series of terrific examples that effectively distill the distinctive arguments under consideration.Partiality is exceptionally clear and stimulating, and I am confident it will quickly be recognized as one of the most significant books on its topic."--Sarah Stroud, McGill University
"Keller's engaging book makes an important contribution to a critical issue in ethical theory. He presents a tremendously succinct presentation of the views."--Diane Jeske, University of Iowa
"Partiality is about the nature and source of our reasons for partiality--a central but controversial area of the moral domain. Keller develops a novel account of these reasons, nested in an elegant taxonomy of rival perspectives and illustrated by a series of terrific examples that effectively distill the distinctive arguments under consideration.Partiality is exceptionally clear and stimulating, and I am confident it will quickly be recognized as one of the most significant books on its topic."--Sarah Stroud, McGill University
| Preface.................................................................... | vii |
| Chapter 1 Special Relationships and Special Reasons....................... | 1 |
| Chapter 2 My Projects..................................................... | 31 |
| Chapter 3 Our Relationship................................................ | 45 |
| Chapter 4 Your Value...................................................... | 78 |
| Chapter 5 My response to Your Value....................................... | 113 |
| References................................................................. | 157 |
| Index...................................................................... | 161 |
Special Relationships and Special Reasons
How Relationships Make a Difference
imagine that you are watching television, and your show is interruptedby a news bulletin. There has been a fire, and several peoplehave lost their homes. How would you respond? you mighttake no notice. You might feel a twinge of sympathy. If the storyhas an especially strong effect on you, you might donate somemoney to help the victims rebuild their lives.
Now imagine that as you watch the news bulletin, you recognizeone of the houses that have burned down, and you recognizethe owners. They are your parents. Now, how would you respond?You would feel much more than a twinge of sympathy, andyou would be willing to do much more than donate some money.You would get to the scene as quickly as possible and offer all thesupport you could. It makes a difference that these people areyour parents.
If a friend asks you to help him move house, you might happilyagree, even though you would never do the same thing for astranger. If your sister is having trouble paying her bills, youmight give her some money, even though you would not help paythe bills of just anyone. If your son needs a new jacket, you mightbuy it for him, even though you would not buy a jacket for justany child who needs one.
We give special treatment to those with whom we share certainrelationships. You treat a person differently if she is your friend ora member of your family. You may also treat a person differently ifshe is your colleague, your neighbor, your employee, or yourcompatriot. You may also favor your own country over othercountries, your own team over other teams, or your alma materover other schools. This is partiality.
Not only do we give special treatment to those with whom weshare special relationships; we appear to do so for good reasons.We do not do special things for our friends and family membersjust because we feel like it. Showing a special preference for yourfriends and family members is not just like preferring chocolateice cream to strawberry. If you did not treat your own friends andfamily differently from how you treat strangers, then there wouldbe something wrong with you. When you rush off to be with yourparents after hearing of the fire, you will probably take yourself tobe doing something you ought to do. Even if you do not especiallyfeel like going to comfort your parents—perhaps you havehad a long day and would like to watch the rest of your televisionshow—you might go anyway, because you think you should. Theyare your parents, after all.
Norms of Partiality and Reasons of Partiality
The existence of a special relationship can make a difference towhat you are required to do; perhaps you have a duty to providefor your own children, but not for all children. The existence of aspecial relationship can make a difference to what you are allowedto do; perhaps you are permitted to break an appointment to lookAfter your sick husband, but not to look after just any sick person.and, the existence of a special relationship can make a differenceto what it makes sense for you to do, without making a differenceto what you are required to do or allowed to do; if your friend isrenovating his house, you may have a special reason to invite himto live with you for a few weeks, even though you do not have theduty to issue the invitation, and even though you are permitted toissue it to anyone you like.
In all these ways, and perhaps others too, your special relationshipsare "normatively significant" or make a difference to your"normative situation." Putting it another way, your special relationshipsmake a difference to the standards of assessment towhich your acts are answerable. An act that would otherwise beoptional can be made compulsory; an act that would otherwise beforbidden can be made permissible; an act that would otherwisemake no sense can be made perfectly sensible; and so on. Thestandards to which our acts are answerable can be called "norms,"and the special standards to which our acts are answerable becauseof our special relationships can be called "norms of partiality."
Sometimes, a special relationship changes your normative situationby giving you reasons to perform some acts rather than others.A reason to perform an act is a consideration that counts infavor of the act, in one way or another. A reason to act, that is tosay, is a consideration that really counts in favor of the act, not onethat merely seems to count in its favor, or that someone merelythinks to count in its favor. (On this way of talking, all reasons aregood reasons; a "bad reason" is no reason at all.) A "reason of partiality"is a reason that is generated by a special relationship, orthat you have because you are in some special relationship. Perhapsone consideration that counts in favor of your rushing toyour parents' side after hearing of the fire is that it will bringcomfort to your parents. If so, then that is a reason for you to rushto your parents' side. If it is a reason you have because these peopleare your parents, then it is a reason of partiality.
In other cases, a special relationship may make a difference toyour normative situation without generating reasons. The fact thatyou are in a certain special relationship may give you permissionto do something without giving you any reason to do it. Perhapsyou are allowed to send your own child to piano lessons, but not tosend just any child to piano lessons, but whether you have a goodreason to send your child to piano lessons is a separate question.
(This case might be explained as one in which your special relationshiptakes away a reason that would otherwise be there. Perhapsyou have a reason not to make other children go to pianolessons, but you do not have the same reason when it comes toyour own child; perhaps that is what it is for you to have a specialpermission to make your child go to piano lessons. So perhaps thedifference made by your special relationship here can be explainedas a difference made to your reasons. But this is neither obviousnor, for present purposes, important.)
Reasons and Motives
The considerations counting in favor of our acts are not necessarilythe considerations by which we are moved to act. Our reasonscan be different from our motives. When you rush off to be withyour parents after hearing of the fire, you might be moved by thethought that your parents are in distress and would benefit fromyour presence, or by the thought that it is your duty to be withyour parents in their time of need, or by the thought that peoplewill think badly of...
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Anbieter: World of Books (was SecondSale), Montgomery, IL, USA
Hardback. Zustand: Good. We are partial to people with whom we share special relationships--if someone is your child, parent, or friend, you wouldn't treat them as you would a stranger. But is partiality justified, and if so, why? Partiality presents a theory of the reasons supporting special treatment within special relationships and explores the vexing problem of how we might reconcile the moral value of these relationships with competing claims of impartial morality. Simon Keller explains that in order to understand why we give special treatment to our family and friends, we need to understand how people come to matter in their own rights. Keller first presents two main accounts of partiality: the projects view, on which reasons of partiality arise from the place that people take within our lives and our commitments, and the relationships view, on which relationships themselves contain fundamental value or reason-giving force. Keller then argues that neither view is satisfactory because neither captures the experience of acting well within special relationships. Instead, Keller defends the individuals view, on which reasons of partiality arise from the value of the individuals with whom our relationships are shared. He defends this view by saying that we must accept that two people, whether friend or stranger, can have the same value, even as their value makes different demands upon people with whom they share different relationships. Keller explores the implications of this claim within a wider understanding of morality and our relationships with groups, institutions, and countries. Artikel-Nr. CIN0691154732G
Anzahl: 3 verfügbar
Anbieter: Better World Books, Mishawaka, IN, USA
Zustand: Very Good. Pages intact with possible writing/highlighting. Binding strong with minor wear. Dust jackets/supplements may not be included. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good. Artikel-Nr. 18607298-6
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Vereinigtes Königreich
HRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Artikel-Nr. WP-9780691154732
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. Series: Princeton Monographs in Philosophy. Num Pages: 176 pages. BIC Classification: HPQ. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 219 x 148 x 18. Weight in Grams: 346. . 2013. 1st Edition. Hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. Artikel-Nr. V9780691154732
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 192 pages. 8.50x5.70x0.80 inches. In Stock. Artikel-Nr. __0691154732
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
Zustand: New. In English. Artikel-Nr. ria9780691154732_new
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: moluna, Greven, Deutschland
Zustand: New. Über den AutorrnrnSimon Keller is associate professor of philosophy at Victoria University, Wellington. He is the author of The Limits of Loyalty.InhaltsverzeichnisPreface vii Chapter 1 Special Relationships and. Artikel-Nr. 594884992
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - We are partial to people with whom we share special relationships--if someone is your child, parent, or friend, you wouldn't treat them as you would a stranger. But is partiality justified, and if so, why Partiality presents a theory of the reasons supporting special treatment within special relationships and explores the vexing problem of how we might reconcile the moral value of these relationships with competing claims of impartial morality. Simon Keller explains that in order to understand why we give special treatment to our family and friends, we need to understand how people come to matter in their own rights. Artikel-Nr. 9780691154732
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar