A Note To Humanity It is time we as a species examine our true purpose for existing in earnest. Establishing the understanding and simply stating a belief, the belief that our inalienable rights were endowed by the Creator, are two entirely different things. What is different is the approach. For hundreds of years, perhaps thousands of years, isolated pockets of humanity have professed the altruistic belief that individual rights are endowed by our Creator. The idea was always based upon an intuitive sense. The esoteric means by which a few select individual could understand the rationale for such an altruistic belief was little understood by the masses. , As a species we have never focused upon building a rational model supporting the idea. ... A model of reality gives us a picture demonstrating where we as individuals stand in reality, which in turn leads us to understand our true essence. It is the understanding of our true nature, which then leads us to understand why we exist which in turn leads to the rational understanding regarding the significance of individual and regarding who or what granted us our individual rights. If our rights were endowed to us by other physical beings, be they human or otherwise, then said rights can rationally be ungifted by those that gifted them. If, however, The Creator of the physical universe endowed our individual rights, then only the Creator can rationally remove them. ... Why Now? What is different regarding humanity’s present point in history, which clearly cries out for a new understanding of man’s true nature? There are many answers to the question: Why now? But three answers immediately come to mind. First: Today humanity stands on ‘the cusp of the third millennium’, stands at the gates of the Age of Aquarius. Second: At this point in the history of the human species, we stand on the verge of stepping off our planet and dispersing throughout the near and potentially far reaches of the universe. Third: Osho’s words give us some insight regarding the question: Why now? ‘When a Buddha moves the wheel of dharma, it takes two thousand five hundred years for it to stop completely. The wheel that Buddha [500 BCE} moved has stopped. The wheel has to be moved again. And that is going to be my and your life's - work - that wheel has to be moved again. Once it starts revolving it will again have twenty-five centuries' [of] life.’ The Diamond Sutra, Osho IDF317, 2004 Tao Publishing, p289 ... What rationale leads this metaphysicist to understand it is possible to develop an advanced model of reality capable of validating the concept of a Universal Brotherhood of Humanity without distinction of race, color, creed or gender’? ... So it is this book provides the rational arguments needed to support the intuitive faith based words: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’ The unanimous declaration of the thirteen united states of America, 7/4/1776 Daniel J. Shepard Metaphysicist/Theosophist
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Mathematics/Science Undergraduate degree - University of Michigan Master's degree in Physical Science - Eastern Michigan University 30 years teaching mathematics & science 20 years science and/or mathematics department chair I’m not sure if I became a philosophical thinker because I was a depressant or if I became a depressant because I was a philosophical thinker. Whichever the case, I am both. To make matters even stranger I am an optimistic depressant philosophical thinker. Actually it might be more accurate of me to state that I am an optimistic depressant philosophical thinking metaphysicist. But how did metaphysics enter the picture? During my early teens I began questioning what was ‘out there beyond …’ Over time this thinking sequentially lead to ‘beyond the stars’, ‘beyond the galaxy’, 'beyond time and space' until I came to the end of the physical universe itself. Once I had reached this 'outer wall' of the physical universe. I could not help but mentally poke a hole in this wall. Having created a hole in the outer wall of the physical, I peered through the hole only to see nothing. At this point I was mesmerized with questions that forever haunted me: What is this nothingness on the ‘outside’ of the physical universe? What is the physical universe immersed within? What is out there? What are the characteristics of this existence outside the universe? What does this outside of the universe have to do with us, with myself, with God Itself? The questions became cruelly unrelenting and overpoweringly dominating of my very psyche. With time and the use of humanity’s four perceptual tools (observation – science, universal teachings – religions, rational dialectics – philosophy and universal language – mathematics) the answers began to reveal themselves. The answers came not in terms of a bias on the part of one tool as opposed to another but in terms of all four tools agreeing with each other. The biggest hurdles to the work came in the form of cynicism, skepticism, closed minds and most of all in the form of the words, ‘can’t’, ‘its impossible to know’, ‘humankind is not intended to understand’, ‘prove it’. In all good conscience, it must be stated, ‘We cannot prove anything beyond all doubt …’ Having stated the obvious, we can then move on to state: ‘… but we can ‘prove beyond a reasonable doubt.‘ So it is a new model of reality emerged capable of leading our species into the new age of the third millennium.
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 338 pages. 7.87x5.04x1.02 inches. In Stock. Artikel-Nr. zk0615478964
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar