A NEW YORKER BEST BOOK OF 2025 • Tech platforms manipulate attention, extract wealth, and deepen inequality. In this new book, Tim Wu (The Attention Merchants) explains how we can reclaim control and create a balanced economy that works for everyone.
“The magic of Tim Wu’s The Age of Extraction is its simplicity. Wu deftly breaks down one of the greatest challenges of our age—the unaccountable power of tech platforms—into such digestible pieces that the solutions for what to do become dead obvious. Essential reading.”—Karen Hao, author of Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman’s OpenAI
"It’s not just in your head—your online life is draining your wallet.... [The Age of Extraction is] a sharp and eye-opening introduction to how we arrived at platform capitalism—where no good click goes unmonetized.”—Kirkus Reviews
Our world is dominated by a handful of tech platforms. They provide great conveniences and entertainment, but also stand as some of the most effective instruments of wealth extraction ever invented, seizing immense amounts of money, data, and attention from all of us. An economy driven by digital platforms and AI influence offers the potential to enrich us, and also threatens to marginalize entire industries, widen the wealth gap, and foster a two-class nation. As technology evolves and our markets adapt, can society cultivate a better life for everyone? Is it possible to balance economic growth and egalitarianism, or are we too far gone?
Tim Wu—the preeminent scholar and former White House official who coined the phrase “net neutrality”—explores the rise of platform power and details the risks and rewards of working within such systems. The Age of Extraction tells the story of an Internet that promised widespread wealth and democracy in the 1990s and 2000s, only to create new economic classes and aid the spread of autocracy instead. Wu frames our current moment with lessons from recent history—from generative AI and predictive social data to the antimonopoly and crypto movements—and envisions a future where technological advances can serve the greatest possible good. Concise and hopeful, The Age of Extraction offers consequential proposals for taking back control in order to achieve a better economic balance and prosperity for all.
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Tim Wu is Julius Silver Professor of Law, Science and Technology at Columbia Law School. He worked in the White House as special assistant to the President for technology and competition policy. The author of The Master Switch and The Attention Merchants, he lives in New York City.
Chapter 1
The Genius of the Ancient City Square
Everything needs to happen somewhere. That is why every civilization has had specialized spaces that facilitate commerce, speech, and other activities. In ancient Greece, the town square, or “agora,” served not just for buying and selling stuff but also for religious festivals, entertainment, and government.1 The bazaar was invented in the Middle East and much of commerce in ancient China centered on the market-town, or ?. These are the ancestors of today’s tech platforms, and we need to understand what gave them their economic significance.
It might help to better define what we mean by a “platform.” (The English word comes from the French platte fourme or “flat form.”) It can be described as any space or structure that in one way or another brings together two or more groups to transact or interact while reducing the costs of doing so. They can be buyers and sellers, but also readers and publishers, listeners and speakers. And as the French word suggests, a platform usually implied a certain evenhandedness.
This definition of a platform covers a lot of ground. It covers the most ancient form of transactional platform just described: the city marketplace. The term encompasses more, including stock exchanges, suburban shopping malls, and the Tokyo fish market, all of which bring together buyers and sellers. And as we shall see later, it also includes so-called enabling platforms that allow their buyers and sellers to do things they otherwise could not.
A Catalytic Space
In chemistry, a catalyst is anything that initiates or accelerates a chemical reaction without being affected itself. The operation of many complex natural systems—like most of the biochemistry that keeps us alive—is largely a story of catalysis.
The same is true in the economy: it is the catalysts that matter most. Selling does not simply “happen” if the price is right. The conditions must be right. It is this power—a catalytic power—that platforms harness.
Stated more formally, the most basic function of the platform is to enable mutually beneficial transactions—and thereby generate wealth or the satisfaction of human wants and needs. Platforms do so by solving not just one but several barriers that otherwise prevent transactions from occurring. Consider four major challenges that a successful platform addresses.
First Problem: Matching
I used to have a fig tree in my backyard, and when the time came, it bore a lot of fruit. A good fig tree will actually produce far more output than any one family can eat. In economic terms, a fig tree creates a surplus. In fact, most agricultural holdings create a surplus relative to family consumption.
The existence of a surplus creates the potential for trade—here, selling excess produce to buyers. In a basic economics class, it is common to assume that the matching of buyers and sellers happens automatically, if the buyer values it more than the seller. If so, the transaction happens, as if by magic.
In real life, as it isn’t always easy to match buyers and sellers, extra produce is often just left to rot. It is the facilitation of such transactions—the existence of marketplaces—that makes all the difference. The successful matching of buyers and sellers is required to make transactions happen. That is why platforms and marketplaces are so key to successful economies.
In this matchmaking function lies much of the value in a platform. In the language of platform economics popularized by French economist Jean Tirole, the platform exists to bring two “sides” of a market together.2 The more buyers and sellers a platform can muster, the more valuable it is. More buyers and more sellers attract more of each, in a version of what is sometimes called “network effects.” As economist David Evans writes in Matchmakers, platform businesses have as “raw materials [. . .] the different groups of customers that they help bring together.”
Think how often advertising for a business conference relies on who will be there. Social media start-ups that fail to reach a critical mass don’t make it; this is one of the reasons that a site like Facebook, despite the many scandals, whistleblowers, and privacy violations, keeps chugging along, as it still has everyone on it.
Sometimes a platform may have trouble attracting enough members of one side of a transactional pair. Often it is buyers who are scarce: when I worked in industry, I recall going to trade shows that were all sellers of equipment and no buyers and were therefore considered a bust. In the old days, a party with too many guys was called a “sausage fest.” Sophisticated platform operators often try to subsidize the missing side, or even pay one group to show up. Hence the practice of paying celebrities to appear at parties, or the old practice—banned in some cities—of offering a gender-based discount (“ladies’ night”) to attract more women to a bar.
Jumping ahead a little, it is clear that in our times matching remains a core function of tech platforms. Every tech platform is at some level in the business of connecting people and businesses. It can be worth losing money on one side or—even for a time—both sides of the transaction. For years, Uber gave everyone rides that were effectively below cost so as to build up the network. And now you can understand one reason that there’s so much “free” stuff on platforms like Google and Facebook: it is the free drink that draws in users so they might meet . . . advertisers.
Second Problem: Information and Trust
Ever consider buying a Persian rug only to be put off by the difficulty of ascertaining what, exactly, you might be getting? Or want to purchase something but have no idea how to get started? Information gaps also prevent transactions from happening in more than one way. To buy something, you need to know, at a minimum, that the product exists and what its price is. For more significant purchases, a buyer also needs to know that the product is of acceptable quality. In a farmers market, the appearance of the product, red tomatoes or green lettuce, conveys a lot. But observing quality can be a subtle thing. Does that used car have an engine that is about to quit? Is that Persian carpet actually from Persia? Is that company selling stock about to go bankrupt?
The seller almost always knows more than the buyer, creating an imbalance (technically, an asymmetry). The owner of an apartment with a train line nearby knows that passing trains will rattle the windows and wake you up, even if you don’t know that. That prospect of unknown (and bad) information can itself deter sales for fearful buyers. I suspect many people don’t buy Persian rugs or used cars precisely because they fear being cheated in one way or another. As economist George Akerlof theorized in a famous 1970 paper, that fear of being cheated or even defrauded can itself function to deter transactions, even if the product is actually fine.3
Since antiquity, platforms have helped solve such informational problems, either by themselves or with the help of the law. In the ancient Athenian agora, the city maintained standard weighing scales and expelled fraudulent sellers. In today’s stock markets, those who wish to sell securities are required to disclose copious amounts of material information intended to ensure that buyers understand the risks of buying stocks. Today’s online marketplaces usually use review systems to try to give buyers a sense of underlying quality.
None...
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Anbieter: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, USA
HRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Artikel-Nr. WB-9780593321249
Anbieter: WorldofBooks, Goring-By-Sea, WS, Vereinigtes Königreich
Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged. Artikel-Nr. GOR014962621
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Magers and Quinn Booksellers, Minneapolis, MN, USA
hardcover. Zustand: New. Brand New. Artikel-Nr. 1514178
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Magers and Quinn Booksellers, Minneapolis, MN, USA
hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. May have light to moderate shelf wear and/or a remainder mark. Complete. Clean pages. Artikel-Nr. 1535273
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Vereinigtes Königreich
Zustand: New. Artikel-Nr. 409468279
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 224 pages. 9.25x6.12x0.62 inches. In Stock. Artikel-Nr. 0593321243
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 224 pages. 9.25x6.12x0.62 inches. In Stock. Artikel-Nr. xr0593321243
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 224 pages. 9.25x6.12x0.62 inches. In Stock. Artikel-Nr. xi0593321243
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. 2025. hardcover. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. Artikel-Nr. V9780593321249
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: moluna, Greven, Deutschland
Zustand: New. Tim Wu is Julius Silver Professor of Law, Science and Technology at Columbia Law School. He worked in the White House as special assistant to the President for technology and competition policy. The author of The Master Switch and The Attention Me. Artikel-Nr. 2156917654
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar