Stating that changing what one does subsequently changes what one feels, a guide to relationship renewal demonstrates the secret to striking a balance between caring for oneself and working for a partnership. 75,000 first printing. $75,000 ad/promo. Tour.
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Susan Page is a nationally known relationship expert and workshop leader. She began her career as a campus minister and is the former director of women's
programs at the University of California at Berkeley. She is the author of If I'm So Wonderful, Why Am I Still Single?, which has been translated into fourteen languages, and of Eight Essential Traits of Couples Who Thrive. A native of Ohio, she lives in Berkeley, California, with her husband of fifteen years.
Susan Page is the former director of women's programs at the University of California at Berkeley.
rough book, How One of You Can Bring the Two of You Together, suggests a completely different approach for improving a marriage. Susan Page dispels the myth that repairing a relationship is necessarily a two-person task and shows that making changes in your marriage by yourself is an effective and a low-stress strategy. Based on the premise that what you do in a relationship changes how you feel about it, Page shows you how you can take individual action that will result in mutual strength and happiness.
Step by step, Page demonstrates that the secret to a thriving marriage is finding the balance between taking care of yourself and extending good will to your partner. Through a series of experiments, she introduces the concept of Loving Leadership and presents a range of solo strategies for creating harmony in a marriage, including how to:
* Develop fresh perspectives about your relationship
* Overc
CHAPTER ONE
How to Work Alone on a Two-Person Relationship
Whenever I mention one person bringing two people together, skeptics tell me, even with a touch of irritation bordering on anger, "I object to the whole idea of working alone to improve my relationship," giving reasons like these:
1. It won't work in principle. A good relationship requires two willing participants.
2. I've already been working alone for years, and it hasn't worked.
3. My relationship is in awful shape. And my spouse won't cooperate. I'm afraid my marriage isn't worth working on.
4. Working alone isn't fair.
5. What about intimacy and soul connection? Don't both people have to be present and available for that?
6. One more time, the entire burden for change falls on women. This program perpetuates the outdated idea that it is women's job to take care of the relationship.
7. Taking all the responsibility by yourself is codependent, something I'm striving to eliminate altogether in my life.
8. Exactly how do I work alone? I can't even imagine what that would be like. Doesn't my partner have to be involved in some way?
I understand these worries; they are valid concerns. Let me respond.
Working alone won't work in principle! A good relationship requires two willing participants, doesn't it?
This popular belief is understandable, but it is simply not true.
Your spouse's disinclination to "work on the relationship" is not an indication of a special problem and not a handicap of any kind. Working alone will not negatively affect the outcome of your efforts. In fact, as you will see, working alone to improve your relationship can be both easier and more effective than working together.
Your spouse may have any number of valid reasons for not wanting to "work on the relationship." Often, it is the man who doesn't want to talk or to go to a counselor. What might be his reasons? Maybe he is afraid that your problems will become worse if you start to delve. Maybe he fears that you are more unhappy than you seem, and you really want to leave him. Maybe he is vaguely aware of some painful memories or regrets, and he doesn't want to dredge them up. Maybe he resents the time counseling will take. Maybe he carries around the belief that you don't ask for help unless your marriage is really on the rocks. Maybe he fears that he can't change in the ways you want him to, and he sees no alternatives. Maybe his best friend had a bad experience with a counselor. He may think that the problems are all your fault, but that you will expect him to make all the changes. He probably has no vision of what your relationship could be. Or maybe in his experience, the relationship has no problems. If he does see problems, he probably has absolutely no idea that he is doing anything to contribute to them.
Who knows? Whatever his reason, you must realize, it is a valid reason for him, and the best thing you can do is to respect it.
There are probably many traits you would change about your partner if you could wave a magic wand. Save your wand for something more significant than your spouse's reluctance to go for counseling.
Working on your relationship by yourself does not mean that you have less potential for happiness with your partner than a couple who are working together. A marriage's potential for success might be measured by other factors--like the nature of the problem and the level of commitment present--but whether one or two people are working on change is not one of those factors.
Your motivation is the key to your success. If you want you and your spouse to be closer and experience more pleasure together, no matter what your problems are, you are far more likely to succeed than a couple who go for help together but who are not highly motivated to improve their marriage.
The reason one person acting alone can make a major impact is that a relationship between two people is a single unit with two parts. When one person acts, the other is affected. Your behaviors and attitudes have an impact on your spouse. Right now, you may not be consciously choosing exactly what impact you want to make. If you decide to start improving your relationship, you have to make deliberate choices about the type of impact you want to have.
Using an example, let's look at the difference between working together to solve a problem and working alone.
Like many couples, Mary and John have fallen into a pattern of interacting with each other. Mary reminds John of his household tasks; John expresses anger at being "controlled" by not doing the tasks. It's a perfect plot. She nags; he leaves. Both have been playing their parts for so long that their response has become automatic. Mary is completely unaware that her nagging is actually triggering John's escapes. John is unaware that his escapes are triggering Mary's nagging.
Both Mary and John have a valid point of view. Mary is right that John escapes and doesn't help enough. John is right that Mary tries to control him and won't leave him alone.
Suppose Mary were to decide she wanted the two of them to work on their problem together. First, she'd have to convince John that this was a good idea. John would see this as one more attempt to control him. Now they would have a new topic for their drama! Same script, just a new problem inserted. "Mary keeps trying to get me to go to therapy. I don't think we need it!"
But let's say John eventually agrees to go to a counselor. The counselor may, quite appropriately, want to know what went on in the families John and Mary grew up in. She would work on getting John and Mary to talk with each other, to hear each other's point of view. Since John and Mary are both invested in being right, and since they have been avoiding understanding each other's point of view for years, learning to listen to each other would take time and would itself present problems and frustrations. Meantime, Mary would still be trying to get John to help around the house, and John would still be escaping.
I don't mean to disparage the counselor's methods. Exploring together and listening to each other are valuable. But deciding to work together and then actually doing the work together more than doubles the size of the task of "fixing" the marriage. Moreover, it depends on the continuing cooperation and progress of both parties, something that may or may not occur.
Now suppose either Mary or John decided to work on the relationship alone. Let's take Mary first. She doesn't have to get John to agree to anything. All she has to do is figure out one simple behavior or attitude that she, by herself, can do differently. For the sake of this example, let's say she decides that for fourteen days, she is going to say nothing to John about his lack of cooperation. She cannot know ahead of time what the result will be; but because she is making a unilateral change in the script, the drama will, by definition, change. John may continue his role as before and continue to avoid his household tasks; or he may appreciate Mary's lack of nagging and respond by working more; or he may become very uncomfortable without her nagging and stay away from home more. Mary may think she knows how he will respond, but she doesn't know until she actually experiments. And when she finds out, she can make some new choices. She will be making changes in their relationship all by herself, quickly and easily, and in a way that increases her own self-esteem, inner strength, and power.
Suppose John were the one to decide to make a change by himself. Since he knows quite clearly what Mary wants, he could try doing it once without being asked. Or, he could announce to Mary that he no longer wants to do...
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Anbieter: World of Books (was SecondSale), Montgomery, IL, USA
Zustand: Very Good. Item in very good condition! Textbooks may not include supplemental items i.e. CDs, access codes etc. Artikel-Nr. 00075593708
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
Anbieter: Better World Books, Mishawaka, IN, USA
Zustand: Good. 1st Edition. Former library copy. Pages intact with minimal writing/highlighting. The binding may be loose and creased. Dust jackets/supplements are not included. Includes library markings. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good. Artikel-Nr. GRP93129381
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
Anbieter: Wonder Book, Frederick, MD, USA
Zustand: Very Good. Very Good condition. Good dust jacket. A copy that may have a few cosmetic defects. May also contain light spine creasing or a few markings such as an owner's name, short gifter's inscription or light stamp. Artikel-Nr. E20K-00781
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Wonder Book, Frederick, MD, USA
Zustand: Good. Good condition. Good dust jacket. A copy that has been read but remains intact. May contain markings such as bookplates, stamps, limited notes and highlighting, or a few light stains. Artikel-Nr. Y04A-04609
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
Anbieter: ThriftBooks-Atlanta, AUSTELL, GA, USA
Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. No Jacket. May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less. Artikel-Nr. G0553067303I4N00
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: ThriftBooks-Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. No Jacket. May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less. Artikel-Nr. G0553067303I4N00
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: ThriftBooks-Atlanta, AUSTELL, GA, USA
Hardcover. Zustand: As New. No Jacket. Pages are clean and are not marred by notes or folds of any kind. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less. Artikel-Nr. G0553067303I2N00
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: WorldofBooks, Goring-By-Sea, WS, Vereinigtes Königreich
Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged. Artikel-Nr. GOR011852967
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar