Suggestibility in Legal Contexts: Psychological Research and Forensic Implications (Wiley Series in Psychology of Crime, Policing and Law) - Hardcover

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

Anne M. Ridley is Principal Lecturer in Psychology at London South Bank University, UK, with particular interest in individual diff erences in witness suggestibility as well as strategies for supporting vulnerable witnesses in the legal system. In 2008, she was awarded a National Teaching Fellowship by the Higher Education Academy.

Fiona Gabbert is a Reader in Psychology at Goldsmiths University of London. She is an expert in the area of social infl uences on memory, and has published widely on this topic. Another of Fiona's interests is developing methods to obtain reliable evidence from eyewitnesses. She received an Academic Excellence Award for "Outstanding Achievements in the Area of Investigative Interviewing" in 2011.

David J. La Rooy is a Reader in Psychology at the University of Abertay Dundee, UK. He is also a Scottish Institute for Policing Research Lecturer and his research focuses on issues surrounding the forensic interviewing of children. He teaches evidence-based investigativeinterviewing and oversees the university's degree course in Forensic Psychobiology.

Von der hinteren Coverseite

Wiley Series in the Psychology of Crime, Policing and Law

"Suggestibility is one of the most important psychological concepts to capture the imagination of scientists, both past and present. e internationally known contributors to this volume tackle this concept with scientifi c astuteness and balance, and with an eye towards its importance for the legal fi eld. It is a must read for researchers and practitioners alike."
Elizabeth F. Loftus, Distinguished Professor, University of California, Irvine

Suggestibility in Legal Contexts is a comprehensive guide to the theory, research and forensic implications related to suggestibility in legal contexts. It traces the history of the topic from the early twentieth century to the present, including its post-1970s resurgence after the publication of the seminal research of Elizabeth F. Loftus.

The text engages with the investigative and theoretical controversies that have attended the subject, including controversial topics such as recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse in adulthood, and coerced or false confessions.

Core chapters are structured thematically and cover salient aspects of the fi eld such as research on "immediate" versus "delayed" suggestibility; memory conformity and the relationship between suggestibility and vulnerability factors including age, intellectual disabilities, personality and memory. e text also outlines witness interview techniques that can reduce the eff ect of suggested evidence in legal cases.

Aus dem Klappentext

Wiley Series in the Psychology of Crime, Policing and Law

"Suggestibility is one of the most important psychological concepts to capture the imagination of scientists, both past and present. e internationally known contributors to this volume tackle this concept with scientifi c astuteness and balance, and with an eye towards its importance for the legal fi eld. It is a must read for researchers and practitioners alike."
Elizabeth F. Loftus, Distinguished Professor, University of California, Irvine

Suggestibility in Legal Contexts is a comprehensive guide to the theory, research and forensic implications related to suggestibility in legal contexts. It traces the history of the topic from the early twentieth century to the present, including its post-1970s resurgence after the publication of the seminal research of Elizabeth F. Loftus.

The text engages with the investigative and theoretical controversies that have attended the subject, including controversial topics such as recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse in adulthood, and coerced or false confessions.

Core chapters are structured thematically and cover salient aspects of the fi eld such as research on "immediate" versus "delayed" suggestibility; memory conformity and the relationship between suggestibility and vulnerability factors including age, intellectual disabilities, personality and memory. e text also outlines witness interview techniques that can reduce the eff ect of suggested evidence in legal cases.