In what sense is Orhan Pamuk, under fire by his government for "insulting Turkishness," Turkey's most representative national author in the literary world system? Orhan Pamuk, Secularism and Blasphemy addresses this conundrum, focusing on Pamuk's literary technique as a mode of political engagement that confounds antinomies between secular state (devlet) and politically enfranchised Islam (din), regionalism and cosmopolitanism, Kemalism and Turkism. Drawing on writings not yet accessible to Anglophone readers, as well as on the masterworks - The Black Book, My Name is Red, Snow - Erdag Göknar traces Pamuk's adventures in "postsecular" fictional form. Whether Pamuk is seen transforming the Empire-to-Republic Bildungsroman, fusing the novel with the Sufi tale, or depicting Istanbul as an archive in which Ottoman and Islamic memories are entered into disruptive, anachronistic relation with present modernities, he emerges as a remarkable fabulist of new literary cartographies.Göknar argues persuasively that Pamuk's writings have become a political flashpoint the world over because they are spellbindingly 'blasphemous' in truly unpredictable ways, which is to say, as volatile, translational spaces of the "secular-sacred." This lucidly written and comprehensive study of Pamuk's oeuvre is essential reading for all those interested in the politics of the novel, Turkish literary history, and the stakes of critical secularism in comparative literature today.
Emily Apter, New York University (author of The Translation Zone. A New Comparative Literature)
Orhan Pamuk, Secularism and Blasphemy analyzes more than the Turkish Nobel laureate, more than the Turkish novel, and more than Turkish politics.It makes sense of the contradictory interactions among Pamuk, his writing, his homeland’s Ottoman past and present anxieties about the role of Islam in a secular state.Göknar helps us better understand Pamuk and Turkey by highlighting the politics of literary life in a globalizing age.
Walter Andrews, University of Washington (author of The Age of Beloveds: Love and the Beloved in Early Modern Ottoman Culture and Society)Reseña del editor:
Orhan Pamuk, Secularism and Blasphemy is the first critical study of all of Pamuk’s novels, including the early untranslated work.
In 2005 Orhan Pamuk was charged with "insulting Turkishness" under Article 301 of the Turkish penal code. Eighteen months later he was awarded the Nobel Prize. After decades of criticism for wielding a depoliticized pen, Pamuk was cast as a dissident through his trial, an event that underscored his transformation from national literateur to global author. By contextualizing Pamuk’s fiction into the Turkish tradition and by defining the literary and political intersections of his work, Orhan Pamuk, Secularism and Blasphemy rereads Pamuk's dissidence as a factor of the form of his novels.
This is not a traditional study of literature, but a book that turns to literature to ask larger questions about recent transformations in Turkish history, identity, modernity, and collective memory. As a corrective to common misreadings of Pamuk’s work in its international reception, Orhan Pamuk, Secularism and Blasphemy applies various analytical lenses to the politics of the Turkish novel, including gender studies, cultural translation, historiography, and Islam. The book argues that modern literature that confronts representations of the nation-state, or devlet, with those of Ottoman, Islamic, and Sufi contexts, or din, constitute "secular blasphemies" that redefine the politics of the Turkish novel.
Concluding with a meditation on conditions of "untranslatability" in Turkish literature, this study provides a comprehensive and critical analysis of Pamuk’s novels to date.
Über diesen Titel kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.