Shattered Tablets: Why We Ignore the Ten Commandments at Our Peril - Hardcover

Klinghoffer, David

 
9780385515672: Shattered Tablets: Why We Ignore the Ten Commandments at Our Peril
Hardcover
ISBN 10: 0385515677 ISBN 13: 9780385515672
Verlag: Crown Pub, 2007

Inhaltsangabe

Is morality based on some essential truth or is it defined by society? In this highly original critique of American social mores and popular culture, David Klinghoffer argues that the Ten Commandments are essential to maintaining a morally healthy society. With the meticulousness of a scholar, he begins by excavating the meaning of the Commandments. Drawing on the millennia-old rabbinical work Mechilta, he explains that the Decalogue was written on two tablets to show that when a country neglects the Commandments written on the first tablet—those having to do with the relationship between God and peoplethe interpersonal relationships described on the second tablet suffer irreparable damage as well. By shrugging off the Bible as a guide and turning toward secularism, America has created a crude, cruel, and dishonest national life.

Addressing such timely topics as the controversy over public displays of the Commandments and the battles over Intelligent Design, Klinghoffer demonstrates that Christians and Jews are united in their opposition to the pagan aspects of our culture. In the tradition of Hebrew prophets like Jeremiah and Isaiah, he describes our failings with humor and compassion, but also with anger and disappointment. An unusual, incisive perspective on the role of religion in society, SHATTERED TABLETS is sure to spark debate. In the end Klinghoffer arges that by shrugging off the Bible as a guide and turning toward secularism, America has created a crude, cruel, and dishonest national life.

Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Über die Autorin bzw. den Autor

DAVID KLINGHOFFER is the author of The Lord Will Gather Me In, a memoir of Jewish conversion, The Discovery of God, a spiritual biography of Abraham, and Why the Jews Rejected Jesus. He lives in Seattle, Washington.

Auszug. © Genehmigter Nachdruck. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

FIRST COMMANDMENT
God–Consciousness


I am the Lord your God,
who has taken you out of the land of Egypt,
from the house of slavery.
(Exodus 20:2)


On a damp winter night in Seattle, I attended a protest rally against the first commandment. The Oxford biologist and best–selling author Richard Dawkins had come to address a crowd at Town Hall, a cavernous defunct church now used for cultural events. The suave Brit, a type for which Americans swoon, roused and delighted his listeners. Ostensibly, Dawkins’s subject was Darwinian evolution, of which he is the English–speaking world’s boldest and most charming advocate. But the mostly middle–aged, flannel–bundled Seattlites, packed tightly in the curving wooden pews of the old vaulted sanctuary, seemed less fired up by scientific details than by what the author had to say about modern life and values.

Dawkins set the evening’s tone by declaring himself “hostile to all forms of religion.” Over and over, he stuck his thumb in the eye of religionists by referring to the Darwinist belief that, far from being God’s children, humans are no more than animals. “We are all glorified lungfish,” he said with relish, exhaling contempt for any contrary opinion, “cousins of kangaroos and bacteria,” “fellow apes.”

He warned that with an evangelical Christian like George W. Bush in the White House, “People need to understand what they are up against in a society which is ruled by religious bigotry.” The audience clapped and guffawed. When Dawkins reflected on the fact that “My publishers are no fools and planned the best places to go” to promote his book, wild applause interrupted him. He continued: “Of eight states we’re visiting, all eight are blue states. Presumably these are states where they read books.” More wild clapping and giddy laughter ensued as Dawkins’s listeners applauded themselves for not being religious bigots, for living in a blue state, and for reading books. At one point, a member of the audience, standing up to ask a question, put her finger on the very central point, speaking passionately of how she “finds the naturalistic worldview immensely liberating compared to the alternative.”

I have set before you the fans of Richard Dawkins only as an initial illustration of a much wider–spread attachment to naturalism, also known as materialism, the viewpoint in which everything that ever happened in cosmic history, from the big bang to today, did so for purely natural, material reasons, never due to supernatural causes. It’s not atheism exactly, but it makes God beside the point. Darwinism is a prime example. Secularism, whose effects on our country's national life I intend to measure in this book, is the ideological view that would enshrine materialism as the official quasi–religion of American culture and government.

A goodly number of us assume that anyone who's not an idiot will of course take the purely naturalistic view. This question, which may sound abstract, is tearing America apart.

The Town Hall event occurred as America was heading for a crisis in the war over “ntelligent design,” the minority scientific viewpoint that finds evidence of a designer’s hand at work in life’s history over hundreds of millions of years. Darwinism and religious faith begin from mutually exclusive assumptions about reality. In The Origin of Species, Darwin’s working premise is that God has no role in the unfolding of the story of life. In view of this belief, which he never states or defends, but simply assumes, he goes on to detail his theory about natural selection operating on random variation. It is only in the absence of a supreme being working out his will in history that we would even undertake Darwin’s search for a purely materialistic explanation of how complex organisms arise. As Darwin himself clarified in his correspondence, “I would give absolutely nothing for the theory of natural selection if it requires miraculous additions at any one stage of descent.” Religion, by contrast, does not assume that material reality is all there is. In the struggle between Darwin and intelligent design, a naive literal interpretation of the Bible’s creation story is not what is at issue. Rather, the point being debated, ultimately, is whether the universe ever had a need for a designer, whether God or otherwise.

It just so happens that, centuries before Darwin, medieval Jewish scholars understood that the distinction between the “naturalistic worldview” and its “alternative” was exactly the key to understanding the first commandment. Recall the exact wording: “I am the Lord your God, who has taken you out of the land of Egypt, from the house of slavery.” The Jewish sages asked why, in defining Himself, God had harked back to the exodus of the Jews from Egyptian slavery, recounted in the Bible's Book of Exodus shortly before the giving of the Ten Commandments, rather than to a still more dramatic event: the creation of the world, which He accomplishes in the Bible’s opening chapter. It’s as if a parent, wanting to impress her child with the awesomeness of the parent–child bond, were to say, “I’m your mother, who picks you up from school every day,” rather than, “I’m your mother, who gave birth to you.”

Rabbi Ovadiah Sforno, an Italian sage born about 1470, taught that God saw it as a matter of highest priority to warn against what we today call a naturalistic worldview. If He had defined Himself here as the creator, that would not draw the line sharply enough. After all, there are ways to explain certain aspects of creation within the limits of naturalistic terms. But the Exodus is different. Accompanied by ten bizarre plagues that God inflicted on the Jews’ Egyptian oppressors, and climaxing with His splitting of the Sea of Reeds to drown the Egyptian army as it pursued the escaped slaves, the Exodus can only be comprehended as a miracle, a blatant violation of nature’s laws.

The point is, God does what He wants. He interferes. He gets involved in our lives and the lives of all creatures past and present, if often from inscrutable motives, reserving the right to direct the whole world down to the smallest details. He runs the show. And He doesn’t let nature stand in His way. This is the claim made by the first commandment, and it is one at which many Americans bridle.


Can it be true that such modern–sounding questions are what Moses had in mind in 1312 b.c.e., when, according to tradition, he led two million escaped Egyptian slaves to freedom and gave them the Ten Commandments? Did Moses somehow foresee our contemporary lives of more than three thousand years later? I don’t know what Moses thought, but the words attributed to him make an explosive and timely prediction. They predict the way a society’s ideas about God will influence the way its members interact with one another. You don’t have to be a religious believer to wonder if that prediction accurately reflects the way human cultures work. The United States today—whose culture, high and low, we’re about to embark on a tour of—will be our test case.

But the first nation to be confronted with the Ten Commandments and the incisive cultural critique they imply was, of course, that of the Jews. The first generation of the Jewish people, on their way to freedom in the land of Canaan, encamped in the wilderness at the foot of a low mountain, Sinai. There was thunder and lightning and a fire descending on the mountaintop. God instructed the...

„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Verlag
Crown Pub
Erscheinungsdatum
2007
Sprache
Englisch
ISBN 10 
0385515677
ISBN 13 
9780385515672
Einband
Gebundene Ausgabe
Auflage
1
Anzahl der Seiten
244
Kontakt zum Hersteller
Nicht verfügbar
Verantwortliche Person
Nicht verfügbar

Weitere beliebte Ausgaben desselben Titels

9780385515689: Shattered Tablets: Why We Ignore the Ten Commandments at Our Peril

Vorgestellte Ausgabe

ISBN 10:  0385515685 ISBN 13:  9780385515689
Verlag: Spiegel & Grau, 2008
Softcover