Constitutional Limits on Coercive Interrogation (Terrorism Second Series) - Hardcover

By combining his impressive professional experience in this area with his considerable academic expertise, Guiora has written a timely and thought-provoking book. His use of the lessons learned from the interrogations of African Americans in the Deep South is highly original and very illuminating. The result is a very attractive and helpful expert guide on how to handle the explosive mix of coercive methods and human rights. This is a must-read for policymakers, human rights proponents and all those interested in one of the most difficult dilemmas facing liberal democracies today. (Tom Zwart, Utrecht University School of Law)

One of the defining features of the post-9/11 environment in the United States is the extraordinary clash between our need to interrogate alleged terrorists about future threats and our need to maintain traditional U.S. values respecting the rule of law and the dignity of persons. In Constitutional Limits on Coercive Interrogation, Professor Guiora provides a lively, succinct, and penetrating discussion of how U.S. constitutional law should accommodate these needs, at both the theoretical and practical levels. His arguments for treating such detainees under a "hybrid paradigm," in which they are neither like traditional criminals nor like prisoners of war, will likely spark considerable debate in the halls of government and academia, and may point the way forward in a crucial area of the law. (Sean Murphy, George Washington University School of Law)

On September 11, 2001 terrorism instantly became the defining issue of our age. The resulting debates surrounding the inherent tension between national security interests and individual civil rights has focused national and international attention on how post-9/11 detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, and around the world have been interrogated. All concerned agree that, while interrogation practices represent a crucial meeting ground between human rights and counter-terrorism measures, the limits placed on interrogators are perhaps the most difficult to define for they determine how "far" a civil society is willing to go in fighting the exigencies that terror presents.