The Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really Thinking - Softcover

Robertson, David Brian

9780190686154: The Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really Thinking

Softcover

ISBN 10: 0190686154 ISBN 13: 9780190686154

Verlag: Oxford University Press, 2017

Alle Exemplare dieser ISBN-Ausgabe

1 Gebraucht

Von EUR 18,86

2 Neu

Von EUR 44,54

Cr�ticas

The Original Compromise combines profound scholarship with remarkably accessible writing to make more clear than ever before just how and why the Constitution emerged in the form that it did. Robertson is attentive to the framers' ideas and their intertwined interests, and he traces persuasively the initiatives, negotiations, and compromises that led to their imperfect but enduring achievement. (Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania)

By systematically considering the political process that produced the Constitution, this immensely useful and beautifully realized study reveals the many compromises that made the government of the United States possible. So doing, it deepens understanding of key themes in American political development, and thoughtfully explains why ambiguities about constitutional meaning continue to animate contemporary disputes. (Ira Katznelson, Ruggles Professor of Political Science and History, Columbia University)

The Philadelphia Convention may have been 'an assembly of demigods,' as Thomas Jefferson later suggested. But the Constitution was still written one word at a time. By letting the delegates speak for themselves, Robertson shows us that genius works in pieces, that creation is a stormy voyage of discovery, and that human frailty is a necessary virtue. (Richard F. Bensel, Professor of Government, Cornell University)

...Robertson draws chiefly from the records of the convention debates to portray the reasoning of the delegates and the progression of agreements and compromises... Recommended. (CHOICE)

Rese�a del editor

The eighty-five famous essays by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay―known collectively as the Federalist Papers―comprise the lens through which we typically view the ideas behind the U.S. Constitution. But we are wrong to do so, writes David Brian Robertson, if we really want to know what the Founders were thinking.

In this provocative new account of the framing of the Constitution, Robertson observes that the Federalist Papers represented only one side in a fierce argument that was settled by compromise―in fact, multiple compromises. Drawing on numerous primary sources, Robertson unravels the highly political dynamics that shaped the document. Hamilton and Madison, who hailed from two of the larger states, pursued an ambitious vision of a robust government with broad power. Leaders from smaller states envisioned only a few added powers, sufficient to correct the disastrous weakness of the Articles of Confederation, but not so strong as to threaten the governing systems within their own states. The two sides battled for three arduous months; the Constitution emerged piece by piece, the product of an evolving web of agreements. Robertson examines each contentious debate, including arguments over the balance between the federal government and the states, slavery, war and peace, and much more. In nearly every case, a fractious, piecemeal, and very political process prevailed. In this way, the convention produced a government of separate institutions, each with the will and ability to defend its independence. Majorities would rule, but the Constitution made it very difficult to assemble majorities large enough to let the government act.

Brilliantly argued and deeply researched, this book will change the way we think of "original intent." With a bracing willingness to challenge old pieties, Robertson rescues the political realities that created the government we know today.

��ber diesen Titel� kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.