Quine on Meaning: The Indeterminacy of Translation: 6 (Continuum Studies in American Philosophy) - Hardcover

"'Quine's doctrines of underdetermination of theory and indeterminacy of translation have often been confused and misunderstood. Eve Gaudet traces the roots of these doctrines in Quine's philosophy, showing how they reflect significantly different concerns and play substantially different roles. Her painstaking survey of Quine's writings offers unimpeachable support for her findings. She goes on to examine some of the prominent misconstruals of the doctrines, including those by Chomsky and Rorty. From now on, anyone who works on Quine's philosophy will be well advised to study Gaudet's work.' Joseph S. Ullian, Washington University in St. Louis."

Willard Van Orman Quine was certainly the greatest analytic philosopher of the second half of the twentieth century. Born in 1908, he held the Edgar Pierce Chair of Philosophy at Harvard University from 1956 to 2000. He made highly important contributions to such areas as mathematical logic, set theory, the philosophy of language, and the philosophy of logic. His best known works include "From a Logical Point of View", "Ontological Relativity" and other essays, and his most influential Word and Object. One of Quine's central doctrines is the 'indeterminacy of translation' - the assertion that there is no objective answer to the question of what someone means by any given sentence. This view was first put forward in Word and Object and was shocking enough to draw criticisms from other leading philosophers like Noam Chomsky and Richard Rorty. Eve Gaudet argues that these controversies stem partly from Quine's ambiguities and changes of mind, and partly from his readers' misunderstandings. Gaudet dissipates the confusion by examining afresh. Quine's whole concept of 'a fact of the matter', and evaluating the contributions to the debate by Chomsky, Rorty, Friedman, Gibson and Follesdal in the light of her new interpretation. This is the first book devoted to a defence of Quine's indeterminacy of translation doctrine. Unlike many who conclude in Quine's favour, Gaudet adopts a critical and nuanced approach to Quine's texts, showing that Quine sometimes changed his positions and was not always as clear and consistent as many assume.