Produktart
Zustand
Einband
Weitere Eigenschaften
Gratisversand
Land des Verkäufers
Verkäuferbewertung
Verlag: Verso Books, 1995
ISBN 10: 1859840957ISBN 13: 9781859840955
Anbieter: Books From California, Simi Valley, CA, USA
Buch
paperback. Zustand: Good.
Mehr Angebote von anderen Verkäufern bei ZVAB
Neu ab EUR 16,84
Gebraucht ab EUR 4,58
Mehr entdecken Softcover
Verlag: Wilhelm Fink Verlag München, 1991
ISBN 10: 3770526775ISBN 13: 9783770526772
Anbieter: medimops, Berlin, Deutschland
Buch
Gut/Very good: Buch bzw. Schutzumschlag mit wenigen Gebrauchsspuren an Einband, Schutzumschlag oder Seiten. / Describes a book or dust jacket that does show some signs of wear on either the binding, dust jacket or pages.
Mehr Angebote von anderen Verkäufern bei ZVAB
Gebraucht ab EUR 6,79
Verlag: Boom, 1990
ISBN 10: 9060099222ISBN 13: 9789060099223
Anbieter: Kloof Booksellers & Scientia Verlag, Amsterdam, Niederlande
Buch
Zustand: very good. Meppel: Boom,1990. Paperback. 200p. Condition : very good copy. ISBN 9789060099223. Keywords : PHILOSOPHY, Foucault, Michel (1926-1984).
Verlag: SUN 2005, 2005
ISBN 10: 9085060494ISBN 13: 9789085060499
Anbieter: Antiquariaat Schot, Hendrik-Ido-Ambacht, Niederlande
Buch
Paperback, nette staat, 348 pagina's.
Mehr Angebote von anderen Verkäufern bei ZVAB
Gebraucht ab EUR 14,95
Verlag: Vantilt 2010, 2010
Anbieter: Antiquariaat Schot, Hendrik-Ido-Ambacht, Niederlande
Paperback, met flappen, nette staat, 269 pagina's.
Verlag: Springer, 2000
ISBN 10: 0792363973ISBN 13: 9780792363972
Anbieter: Cambridge Rare Books, Cambridge, GLOUC, Vereinigtes Königreich
Buch
Paperback. Zustand: GOOD. 2000-05-31. Springer. Paperback. GOOD Previous owners name. Edgewear. 9.5x6.5.
Mehr Angebote von anderen Verkäufern bei ZVAB
Neu ab EUR 217,00
Gebraucht ab EUR 39,41
Mehr entdecken Softcover
Verlag: Springer Netherlands, 2014
ISBN 10: 9400789262ISBN 13: 9789400789265
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - At the origin of this volume, a simple question: what to make of that surprisingly monotonous series of statements produced by our societies and our philosophers that all converge in one theme- the importance of difference To clarify the meaning of the difference at stake here, we have tried to rephrase it in terms of the two major and mutually competing paradigms provided by the history of phenomenology only to find both of them equally unable to accommodate this difference without violence. Neither the ethical nor the ontological approach can account for a subject that insists on playing a part of its own rather than following the script provided for it by either Being or the Good. What appears to be, from a Heideggerian or Levinasian perspective, an unwillingness to open up to what offers to deliver us from the condition of subjectivity is analysed in these pages as a structure in its own right. Far from being the wilful, indifferent and irresponsive being its critics have portrayed it to be, the so-called 'postmodern' subject is essentially finite, not even able to assume the transcendence to which it owes its singularity. This inability is not a lack- it points instead to a certain unthought shared by both Heidegger and Levinas which sets the terms for a discussion no longer our own. Instead of blaming Heidegger for underdeveloping 'being-with', we should rather stress that his account of mineness may be, in the light of contemporary philosophy, what stands most in need of revision. And, instead of hailing Levinas as the critic whose stress on the alterity of the Other corrects Heidegger's existential solipsism, the problems into which Levinas runs in defining that alterity call for a different diagnosis and a corresponding change in the course that phenomenology has taken since. Instead of preoccupying itself with the invisible, we should focus on the structures of visibility that protect us from its terror.The result An account of difference that is neither ontological nor ethical, but 'mè-ontological', and that can help us understand some of the problems our societies have come to face (racism, sexism, multiculturalism, pluralism). And, in the wake of this, an unexpected defence of what is at stake in postmodernism and in the question it has refused to take lightly: who are we Finally, an homage to Arendt and Lyotard who, if read through each other's lenses, give an exact articulation to the question with which our age struggles: how to think the 'human condition' once one realizes that there is an 'inhuman' side to it which, instead of being its mere negation, turns out to be that without which it would come to lose its humanity.
Verlag: Springer Netherlands, 2004
ISBN 10: 1402028253ISBN 13: 9781402028250
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - At the origin of this volume, a simple question: what to make of that surprisingly monotonous series of statements produced by our societies and our philosophers that all converge in one theme- the importance of difference To clarify the meaning of the difference at stake here, we have tried to rephrase it in terms of the two major and mutually competing paradigms provided by the history of phenomenology only to find both of them equally unable to accommodate this difference without violence. Neither the ethical nor the ontological approach can account for a subject that insists on playing a part of its own rather than following the script provided for it by either Being or the Good. What appears to be, from a Heideggerian or Levinasian perspective, an unwillingness to open up to what offers to deliver us from the condition of subjectivity is analysed in these pages as a structure in its own right. Far from being the wilful, indifferent and irresponsive being its critics have portrayed it to be, the so-called 'postmodern' subject is essentially finite, not even able to assume the transcendence to which it owes its singularity. This inability is not a lack- it points instead to a certain unthought shared by both Heidegger and Levinas which sets the terms for a discussion no longer our own. Instead of blaming Heidegger for underdeveloping 'being-with', we should rather stress that his account of mineness may be, in the light of contemporary philosophy, what stands most in need of revision. And, instead of hailing Levinas as the critic whose stress on the alterity of the Other corrects Heidegger's existential solipsism, the problems into which Levinas runs in defining that alterity call for a different diagnosis and a corresponding change in the course that phenomenology has taken since. Instead of preoccupying itself with the invisible, we should focus on the structures of visibility that protect us from its terror.The result An account of difference that is neither ontological nor ethical, but 'mè-ontological', and that can help us understand some of the problems our societies have come to face (racism, sexism, multiculturalism, pluralism). And, in the wake of this, an unexpected defence of what is at stake in postmodernism and in the question it has refused to take lightly: who are we Finally, an homage to Arendt and Lyotard who, if read through each other's lenses, give an exact articulation to the question with which our age struggles: how to think the 'human condition' once one realizes that there is an 'inhuman' side to it which, instead of being its mere negation, turns out to be that without which it would come to lose its humanity.
Verlag: Springer Netherlands, 2004
ISBN 10: 1402028261ISBN 13: 9781402028267
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - At the origin of this volume, a simple question: what to make of that surprisingly monotonous series of statements produced by our societies and our philosophers that all converge in one theme- the importance of difference To clarify the meaning of the difference at stake here, we have tried to rephrase it in terms of the two major and mutually competing paradigms provided by the history of phenomenology only to find both of them equally unable to accommodate this difference without violence. Neither the ethical nor the ontological approach can account for a subject that insists on playing a part of its own rather than following the script provided for it by either Being or the Good. What appears to be, from a Heideggerian or Levinasian perspective, an unwillingness to open up to what offers to deliver us from the condition of subjectivity is analysed in these pages as a structure in its own right. Far from being the wilful, indifferent and irresponsive being its critics have portrayed it to be, the so-called 'postmodern' subject is essentially finite, not even able to assume the transcendence to which it owes its singularity. This inability is not a lack- it points instead to a certain unthought shared by both Heidegger and Levinas which sets the terms for a discussion no longer our own. Instead of blaming Heidegger for underdeveloping 'being-with', we should rather stress that his account of mineness may be, in the light of contemporary philosophy, what stands most in need of revision. And, instead of hailing Levinas as the critic whose stress on the alterity of the Other corrects Heidegger's existential solipsism, the problems into which Levinas runs in defining that alterity call for a different diagnosis and a corresponding change in the course that phenomenology has taken since. Instead of preoccupying itself with the invisible, we should focus on the structures of visibility that protect us from its terror.The result An account of difference that is neither ontological nor ethical, but 'mè-ontological', and that can help us understand some of the problems our societies have come to face (racism, sexism, multiculturalism, pluralism). And, in the wake of this, an unexpected defence of what is at stake in postmodernism and in the question it has refused to take lightly: who are we Finally, an homage to Arendt and Lyotard who, if read through each other's lenses, give an exact articulation to the question with which our age struggles: how to think the 'human condition' once one realizes that there is an 'inhuman' side to it which, instead of being its mere negation, turns out to be that without which it would come to lose its humanity.
Verlag: Springer Netherlands, 1999
ISBN 10: 0792359852ISBN 13: 9780792359852
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - THE PART OF THE SUBJECT At the origin of these essays, an increasing weariness produced by all those attempts to oppose what came to be known as Foucault's 'post structuralism' to phenomenology - as if the two were incompatible and as if one could only proceed with thought after having chosen sides. And an equal reluctance to join those who pretended they could carryon as they had before since, quite obviously, there were no sides to choose, 'Foucault' being but the latest example of a relativism that one could easily ignore since it had, like all relativism, already refuted itself by daring to speak. And, finally, behind that weariness and that reluctance, a suspicion that what these two reactions to 'Foucault' had in common was a refusal to go 'toward the things themselves' and thus a refusal to approach the texts that we refer to by that proper name as we would approach other phenomena: not as the body-object of a thought that we would have to locate as coming either 'before' or 'after' phenomenology, but as a series of statements that appear to us in a certain way and whose appearing reveals to us something about our own, finite being.